Perceived facilitators and barriers to physical activity, using the COM-B Model for Behavioural Change, in people with chronic pain: a qualitative evaluation of patient and stakeholder perspectives
Higgins, C.; Dall, P. M.; Leese, C.; Adair, P.; Cameron, P. A.; Inglis, S. K.; Christogianni, A.; Smith, B. H.; Colvin, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundPhysical inactivity is a substantial public health concern and a particularly challenging problem to address. Physical activity is shown to be of therapeutic benefit to those living with chronic pain, but intervention studies have often been unsuccessful in promoting sustainable engagement with physical activity in this population. AimTo develop a more comprehensive understanding of the barriers to engaging with sustainable physical activity and the facilitators that promote this engagement in people with chronic pain. Design & settingThe study design was qualitative, informed by behaviour change theory (the COM-B model), and participants were drawn from two settings. First, 36 adults living with moderate-severe chronic pain were recruited from a specialist NHS pain service. Secondly, 15 stakeholders were recruited to represent a range of healthcare sectors involved in supporting people with chronic pain. MethodOne-to-one semi-structured interviews, informed by the COM-B model, were conducted between May 2020 and October 2021. Interviews were conducted by telephone or using online conferencing software and were transcribed verbatim and anonymised. The Framework Method was used to interpret the data. ResultsThe barriers to sustainable physical activity engagement in people with chronic pain are expansive, and the inclusion of stakeholder perspectives is valuable in developing a more comprehensive understanding of these barriers and also of the facilitators that are successful in promoting sustainable physical activity in this population. ConclusionsThe COM-B model provides a robust theoretical framework for organising and understanding these barriers and facilitators in a way could that inform effective intervention design.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Lower limb chronic edema management program: Perspectives of disengaged patients on challenges, enablers and barriers to program attendance and adherence 97%
- Acceptability of a nurse-led non-pharmacological complex intervention for knee pain: Nurse and patient views and experiences 97%
- ‘The illness isn’t the end of the road’ - Patient perspectives on the initiation of and early participation in a multi-disease, community-based exercise programme 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- “If somebody had told me I’d feel like I do now, I wouldn’t have believed them…” Older adults’ experiences of the BELL trial: a qualitative study 97%
- “It makes you realise your own mortality.” A qualitative study on mental health of older adults in the UK during COVID-19 93%
- Maximising pain services for frail older adults, the views of healthcare professionals and commissioners: findings from the Pain in Older People with Frailty (POPPY) study. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Suitability of just-in-time adaptive intervention in post-COVID-19-related symptoms: A systematic scoping review 94%
- Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an online mindful walking intervention among COVID-19 long haulers: A mixed method study including daily diary surveys 94%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.