Back

Sensitivity Of Medial/Lateral Balance Control To Visual Disturbances While Walking In Young And Older Adults

DiBianca, S. J.; Reimann, H.; Gray, J.; Peterka, R. J.; Jeka, J. J.

2024-12-16 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.12.10.627754 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Humans integrate multiple sources of sensory information to estimate body orientation in space. Balance control experiments while standing provide evidence that the contributions of these sensory channels change under different conditions in a process called sensory reweighting. This study aims to address whether there is evidence for sensory reweighting while walking and explores age-related differences in medial/lateral balance control under visually perturbing walking conditions. Thirty young adults (18-35 years) and thirty older adults (55-79 years) walked on a self-paced treadmill within a virtual environment that delivered frontal plane multi-sine visual disturbances at three amplitudes (6{degrees}, 10{degrees}, and 15{degrees}). Frequency response functions were used to quantify visual sensitivity to balance disturbances, while spatiotemporal gait parameters (e.g., step width, step-width variability) were measured to assess balance control. Visual sensitivity decreased in both populations with increasing stimulus amplitude, analogous to the sensory reweighting hypothesis in balance control while standing. Despite the decrease in visual sensitivity, the compensatory upweighting of other sensory systems was not observed through measurements of remnant sway. Older adults exhibited higher visual sensitivity at all amplitudes compared to young adults, indicating a more sensitive response to visual disturbances to balance control. Both groups showed increases in step width and step width variability with higher visual amplitudes, with older adults demonstrating more pronounced effects. Weak correlations existed between changes in visual sensitivity and changes in step width and step width variability suggesting a limited interaction between sensory reweighting and gait stability.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.2%
3
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
5
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.2%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.7%
7
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
8
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
11
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
12
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
13
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
14
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.5%
15
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
16
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
17
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
20
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
21
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
23
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
27
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%