Back

Effects of Disease on Renal Blood Flow Regulation: Assessing Autoregulation Disruption

Maddineni, B.; Versypt, A. N. F.

2024-12-15 physiology
10.1101/2024.12.09.627590 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The functioning of kidneys on blood flow regulation was investigated, particularly under diseased conditions such as chronic kidney disease, which includes conditions of diabetic nephropathy and other glomerular damage. A mathematical model was developed to better understand how variations based on the glomerular filtration rate impact key kidney function outputs, such as afferent arteriolar diameter, smooth muscle activation, and the chloride ion concentration at the macula densa. We have analyzed these factors by considering the dynamics of the mathematical model of ordinary and partial differential equations to study blood flow control in the kidney, which has provided new insights into the maintenance of autoregulation. By simulating the processes of renal blood flow--specifically through the afferent arteriole and glomerulus, and detailing the process of chloride transport within the renal tubule--the model offers a comprehensive view of how the kidney regulates glomerular filtration rate amidst fluctuating systemic blood pressures and disease-specific changes. Central to this model are the myogenic response that adjusts afferent arteriole muscle tone in reaction to pressure changes and the tubuloglomerular feedback, which controls arteriole size based on chloride levels at the macula densa. The models simulations reveal the robustness of renal autoregulation across a spectrum of chronic kidney disease stages, showing stability under normal conditions but indicating a breakdown in regulation with advanced chronic kidney disease. This breakdown is attributed to disruptions in the vascular and feedback systems. The findings from this model shed light on the progression of renal dysfunction in chronic kidney disease and underscore the potential for developing targeted treatments to maintain kidney health.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
5
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
8
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
9
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
11
Function
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
12
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
13
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
14
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
16
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
17
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
18
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%