Chromosome engineering points to the cis-acting mechanism of chromosome arm-specific telomere length setting and robustness of plant phenotype, chromatin structure and gene expression
Helia, O.; Matusova, B.; Havlova, K.; Hyskova, A.; Lycka, M.; Beying, N.; Puchta, H.; Fajkus, J.; Fojtova, M.
Show abstract
The study investigates the impact of targeted chromosome engineering on telomere dynamics, chromatin structure, gene expression, and phenotypic stability in Arabidopsis thaliana. Using precise CRISPR/Cas-based engineering, reciprocal translocations of chromosome arms were introduced between non-homologous chromosomes. The subsequent homozygous generations of plants were assessed for phenotype, transcriptomic changes and chromatin modifications near translocation breakpoints, and telomere length maintenance. Phenotypically, translocated lines were indistinguishable from wild-type plants, as confirmed through morphological assessments and principal component analysis. Gene expression profiling detected minimal differential expression, with affected genes dispersed across the genome, indicating negligible transcriptional impact. Similarly, ChIPseq analysis showed no substantial alterations in the enrichment of key histone marks (H3K27me3, H3K4me1, H3K56ac) near junction sites or across the genome. Finally, bulk and arm-specific telomere lengths remained stable across multiple generations, except for minor variations in one translocation line. These findings highlight the remarkable genomic and phenotypic robustness of A. thaliana despite large-scale chromosomal rearrangements. The study offers insights into the cis-acting mechanisms underlying chromosome arm-specific telomere length setting and establishes the feasibility of chromosome engineering for studies of plant genome evolution and crop improvement strategies. Significance statementThis study demonstrates the robustness of Arabidopsis thaliana in maintaining telomere stability, chromatin integrity, and wild-type phenotype despite large-scale chromosomal translocations. It underscores the potential of chromosome engineering in advancing genome evolution research and crop improvement, contributes to a deeper understanding of genome dynamics, and opens new avenues for precision breeding in plants.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterization of FLOWERING LOCUS T related genes and their putative gene regulatory network in semi-winter Brassica napus cultivar Zhongshaung11 96%
- Cryptic promoter activation occurs by at least two different mechanisms in the Arabidopsis genome 96%
- Lf2 is a knotted homeobox regulator that modulates leaflet number in soybean 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Frequent spontaneous structural rearrangements promote rapid genome diversification in a Brassica napus F1 generation 98%
- Industrial chicory genome gives insight into the molecular time table of anther development and male sterility 95%
- Maize (Zea mays L.) nucleoskeletal proteins regulate nuclear envelope remodeling and function in stomatal complex development and pollen viability. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiplex knockout of trichome-regulating MYB duplicates in hybrid poplar using a single gRNA 96%
- Paralog editing tunes rice stomatal density to maintain photosynthesis and improve drought tolerance 96%
- Increased chloroplast area in the rice bundle sheath through cell specific perturbation of brassinosteroid signalling 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epigenetic state and gene expression remain stable after CRISPR/Cas-mediated chromosomal inversions 97%
- Lysine 27 of histone H3.3 is a fine modulator of developmental gene expression and stands as an epigenetic checkpoint for lignin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis 96%
- Genetic screen to saturate guard cell signaling network reveals a role of GDP-L-fucose metabolism in stomatal closure 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.