Early identification of Family Medicine residents at risk of failure using Natural Language Processing and Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Joshi, A.; Mortezaagha, P.; Inkpen, D.; Seale, E.; Archibald, D.; Noel, K.; Rahgozar, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundDuring residency, each resident is observed and receives feedback based on their performance. Residency training is demanding, with some residents struggling with their academic performance. A competency-based residency training programs success depends on its ability to identify residents with difficulty during their first year of post-graduate education and to provide them with timely intervention and support. ObjectiveIn large training programs such as Family Medicine, identifying residents at risk of failing their certification exams is difficult. We developed an AI system using state-of-the-art technologies in Machine Learning (ML), Deep Learning (DL), Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Explainable AI (XAI) to detect at-risk residents automatically. Materials and MethodsThe research was conducted in the 2023-24 academic year. We implemented ML, DL and NLP models for prediction and performance analysis. The target variable chosen for the prediction was the determination of whether the resident would fail or pass their certification exam. XAI was used to enhance the understanding of the models inner workings. ResultsIn total, there were 1382 data points of residents. The final model, Support Vector Machine (SVM), achieved an accuracy of 89.05% and an F1 score of 74.54 for the multiclass classification when multimodal (text and tabular) data was used. This model outperformed the models that only used qualitative or quantitative data exclusively. ConclusionCombining qualitative and quantitative data represents a novel approach and provided better classification results. This research demonstrates the feasibility of an automated AI system for the early identification of residents at risk of academic struggle. Prior Abstract PresentationAbstract presented at AMEE (An International Association for Medical Education) Conference Basel, Switzerland, August 24-28, 2024.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of ChatGPT on Chinese National Medical Licensing Examinations: A Five-Year Examination Evaluation Study for Physicians, Pharmacists and Nurses 95%
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 94%
- Evaluation of Statistical Illiteracy in Latin American Clinicians and of the Efficacy of a 10-Hour Course 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of Generative Pretrained Transformer on the National Medical Licensing Examination in Japan 94%
- Collaborative intelligence in AI: Evaluating the performance of a council of AIs on the USMLE 94%
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of Advanced Large Language Models (GPT-4o, GPT-4, Gemini 1.5 Pro, Claude 3 Opus) on Japanese Medical Licensing Examination: A Comparative Study 94%
- Synthetic Data Generation in Healthcare: A Scoping Review of reviews on domains, motivations, and future applications 92%
- A Deep Learning Method to Detect Opioid Prescription and Opioid Use Disorder from Electronic Health Records 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.