Temporary fun, permanent damage: a systematic review on the effects of musical characteristics on participants experience and behavior during leisure activities
Daelemans, C.; Bonapart, C.; Smit, A. L.; Stegeman, I.
Show abstract
BackgroundExcessively loud music is frequently played at leisure activities, posing significant health risks. However, the lack of consensus on consumers preferred music settings makes it difficult to implement preventive measures against high noise levels. Therefore, our objective is to systematically evaluate how different musical characteristics influence the experiences and behaviors of individuals engaged in leisure activities. MethodsWe conducted a search for studies examining the effects of musical characteristics on individuals at leisure activities where the musical experience is of primary focus. The search was performed using the Medline Pubmed, Embase Elsevier, Cochrane, PsychInfo, and ClinicalTrial.gov databases. The exclusion criteria included: leisure activities related to sports, studies evaluating music as a treatment, lab settings, case studies, and participants below 15 years old. The NOS, RoB2, and ROBINS-I tools were used to assess risk of bias. Results relevant to our outcomes of interest were extracted and summarized in tables. ResultsWe identified 2503 studies, of which 37 studies were included for data extraction. The total number of participants in this systematic review was 16843. Among the 37 studies, 23 were observational with the remainder being experimental control trials. Risk of bias in the studies was high. Our findings indicate that musical characteristics such as low frequencies, high groove, high tempo, and live performance enhanced participants movements and emotions. Excessively high levels, such as those found in nightclubs, were deemed unnecessary by those exposed. These extreme volumes also caused discomfort and posed a risk to hearing health. InterpretationThe high risk of bias makes it difficult to draw conclusions based on the data in this systematic review. Therefore, and in order to inform policy makers, we need adequate randomized controlled trials in order to assess the effects of different levels of loudness on music experience. FundingDorhout Mees Stichting RegistrationPROSPERO registration: CRD42023412634
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Alarm tones, music and their elements: A mixed methods analysis of reported waking sounds for the prevention of sleep inertia. 94%
- A country-wide health policy in Chile for deaf adults using cochlear implants: analysis of health determinants and social impacts 94%
- Impulse dispersion of aerosols during playing the recorder and evaluation of safety measures 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of ChatGPT in pediatric audiology as rated by students and experts 94%
- Artificial Intelligence in laryngeal endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 92%
- Rehabilitation with and without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs) in stroke patients: a study protocol for a multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial on the effectiveness, acceptability, usability, and economic-organizational sustainability of RADTs from subacute to chronic phase (STROKEFIT4) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-modal sensory boosting to improve high-frequency hearing loss 92%
- Patterns of physical activity among the students of an Indian university and their perceptions about the curricular content concerned with health 92%
- Learning from the resilience of hospitals and their staff to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.