Back

Development and clinical application of a methylated ctDNA assay in the preoperative risk classification of resectable colon cancer

Raunkilde, L.; Andersen, R. F.; Timm, S.; Joergensen, M.; Lindebjerg, J.; Rafaelsen, S. R.; Hansen, T. F.; Jensen, L. H.

2024-12-05 oncology
10.1101/2024.12.04.24318421 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPathological lymph node involvement (pN+) is an indicator of poor prognosis in localized colon cancer. Currently, the preoperative risk classification fails to accurately identify pN+, which could be instrumental in the selection of patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This study aimed to develop an assay for preoperative methylated circulating tumor DNA (meth-ctDNA) as a predictive marker of pN+ and as a biomarker for initiating NAC in patients with localized colon cancer. Materials and methods203 patients operated for colon cancer stage I-III at Vejle Hospital were randomly assigned (1:1) to a discovery and a validation cohort. A multiplex assay of a tumor-specific (NPY) and two organ-specific (GAL3ST3, KANK1) meth-ctDNAs was designed and methylation analysis was performed using droplet digital PCR. The ability of preoperative meth-ctDNA to predict pN+ was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. ResultsROC analyses of meth-ctDNA (negative/positive) to predict pN+ had an area under the curve of 52% and 57% in the discovery and validation cohort, respectively. Survival analysis in the validation cohort confirmed a higher rate of 48 months disease-free survival in meth-ctDNA negative compared to positive patients (HR=2.31, 95% CI 1.01-5.2). The difference also applied to 4-year overall survival (HR=3.62, 95% CI 1.15-11.4). In a multivariate analysis, meth-ctDNA remained the strongest prognostic factor of DFS (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.03-5.88) and OS (HR 4.54, 95% CI 1.32-15.6) in relation to clinical T- or N-category, gender and age. ConclusionThe preoperative meth-ctDNA multiplex assay did not predict pN+. The findings suggest meth-ctDNA as a more powerful marker than N-category in identifying high-risk patients who would potentially benefit from NAC.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.