Back

The unique morphological basis and parallel evolutionary history of personate flowers in Penstemon

Depatie, T. H.; Wessinger, C.

2024-12-05 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.12.02.626427 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PremiseAdaptive radiation in ecologically and morphologically diverse plant lineages presents an opportunity to investigate the rapid evolution of novel floral traits. While some types of floral traits, such as flower color, are well-characterized, other types of complex morphologies remain understudied. One example is occluded personate flowers, dorso-ventrally compressed flowers with obstructed floral passageways, which have evolved in multiple genera, but have only been characterized from snapdragon. MethodsOur study examined the morphological basis and evolutionary history of personate flowers in a clade of Penstemon species that includes three personate-flowered species. We characterized floral morphology and inferred phylogenomic relationships for 13 species in this group in order to examine the evolutionary history of personate flowers. We used phylogenomic tests for introgression to examine whether personate-flowered lineages have a history of introgression. ResultsUnlike the personate flowers of snapdragon, personate flowers in Penstemon are produced by deep pleats in the ventral petal tissue that curve the ventral petal surface upwards, obstructing the floral tube opening. Our phylogenetic tree suggests that personate flowers evolved in two separate lineages. Phylogenomic analyses indicate incomplete lineage sorting and introgression between certain taxa have contributed to phylogenomic discordance, however we found little evidence of recent introgression between the two personate-flowered lineages. ConclusionsThe evolution of personate flowers in Penstemon involves a distinct morphological basis than snapdragon. Personate flowers have evolved multiple times in Penstemon on a rapid evolutionary timescale. The source of genetic variation for repeated shifts may be de novo mutations or pre-existing variants.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
17.2%
3
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
6
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
7
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
8
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.0%
9
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
11
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
12
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
13
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.1%
15
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
19
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
20
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
21
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%