Back

Next Generation Evidence: High-Precision Information Retrieval for Rapid Clinical Guideline Updates

Borchert, F.; Wullenweber, P.; Oeser, A.; Kreuzberger, N.; Karge, T.; Langer, T.; Skoetz, N.; Wieler, L. H.; Schapranow, M.-P.; Arnrich, B.

2024-12-03 health informatics
10.1101/2024.12.02.24318184 medRxiv
Show abstract

Delays in translating new medical evidence into clinical practice hinder patient access to the best available treatments. Our data reveals an average delay of nine years from the initiation of human research to its adoption in clinical guidelines, with 1.7-3.0 years lost between trial publication and guideline updates. A substantial part of these delays stems from slow, manual processes in updating clinical guidelines, which rely on time-intensive evidence synthesis workflows. The Next Generation Evidence (NGE) system addresses this challenge by harnessing state-of-the-art biomedical Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods. This novel system integrates diverse evidence sources, such as clinical trial reports and digital guidelines, enabling automated, data-driven analyses of the time it takes for research findings to inform clinical practice. The NGE system accelerates guideline updates by employing precision-focused literature search filters tailored specifically for guideline maintenance. In benchmarking against two German oncology guidelines, these filters demonstrate exceptional precision in identifying pivotal publications for guideline updates. By streamlining evidence synthesis, NGE has the potential to deliver faster updates, improve guideline responsiveness, and enhance patient access to state-of-the-art treatments.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.