Next Generation Evidence: High-Precision Information Retrieval for Rapid Clinical Guideline Updates
Borchert, F.; Wullenweber, P.; Oeser, A.; Kreuzberger, N.; Karge, T.; Langer, T.; Skoetz, N.; Wieler, L. H.; Schapranow, M.-P.; Arnrich, B.
Show abstract
Delays in translating new medical evidence into clinical practice hinder patient access to the best available treatments. Our data reveals an average delay of nine years from the initiation of human research to its adoption in clinical guidelines, with 1.7-3.0 years lost between trial publication and guideline updates. A substantial part of these delays stems from slow, manual processes in updating clinical guidelines, which rely on time-intensive evidence synthesis workflows. The Next Generation Evidence (NGE) system addresses this challenge by harnessing state-of-the-art biomedical Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods. This novel system integrates diverse evidence sources, such as clinical trial reports and digital guidelines, enabling automated, data-driven analyses of the time it takes for research findings to inform clinical practice. The NGE system accelerates guideline updates by employing precision-focused literature search filters tailored specifically for guideline maintenance. In benchmarking against two German oncology guidelines, these filters demonstrate exceptional precision in identifying pivotal publications for guideline updates. By streamlining evidence synthesis, NGE has the potential to deliver faster updates, improve guideline responsiveness, and enhance patient access to state-of-the-art treatments.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- An Ontology-based Approach to Guide and Document Variable and Data Source Selection and Data Integration Process to Support Integrative Data Analysis in Cancer Outcomes Research 92%
- Automated abstraction of clinical parameters of multiple myeloma from real-world clinical notes using large language models 92%
- An Informatics Consult approach for generating clinical evidence for treatment decisions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of SURUS: a Named Entity Recognition System to Extract Knowledge from Interventional Study Records 96%
- Investigator-initiated versus industry-sponsored trials – Visibility and relevance of randomized controlled trials in clinical practice guidelines (IMPACT) 95%
- Creating an Indexing Scheme for Case Series Articles 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: on the rise, but not yet ready for use – a scoping review 95%
- The impact of retracted randomised controlled trials on systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines: a meta-epidemiological study 94%
- The use of the Registered Reports format for publication of randomized clinical trials: a cross-sectional study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of clinical trial registry entry histories using the novel R package cthist 95%
- Exploring scalable assessment methods for terminated trials in ClinicalTrials.gov: A cohort analysis of German and Californian trials 95%
- An interactive retrieval system for clinical trial studies with context-dependent protocol elements 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.