Back

Does domestication trade-off stress tolerance for leaf growth? A search for evidence across eight Pooideae grass species

Yun, J.; Yuan, C.; Irelan, K.; Kabongo, M.; Urkumbayev, E.; Des Marais, D. L.

2024-12-04 plant biology
10.1101/2024.11.30.626197 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plant domestication is thought to create trade-offs between high yield and stress tolerance, raising concerns about yield stability in future climates. Previous studies have found limited direct evidence for such trade-offs, often focusing on weakened defenses associated with higher growth rates. However, trade-offs can also occur when traits (such as yield in agriculture) optimized for favorable conditions perform less efficiently in stressful conditions. Deciphering the mechanisms driving these trade-offs is crucial for maintaining yield in changing environments. We examine leaf growth, a key trait influencing carbon assimilation, in eight species of grasses. We use a machine learning pipeline to automatically extract cell dimensions and positions from leaf microscope images to study cell kinematics, finding that domesticated plants generally have longer leaves, larger division zones and higher cell production rates. We found no clear evidence of trade-off between domestication and drought response in final leaf length. However, a trade-off is observed in development as wild species exhibited a smaller decrease in elongation zone size under drought than their domesticated counterparts. These nuanced trade-offs associated with domestication highlight the importance of examining physiological traits and mechanisms in greater detail, possibly informing breeding strategies to enhance crop resilience in the face of climate change. HighlightThis study uses a high throughput pipeline to characterize leaf elongation responding to drought stress across eight species including barley, wheat, oat and wild relatives.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.