Back

Soft, 3D printed muscle ultrasound phantom with structurally tunable B-mode echo intensity

Gillespie, S.; Collins, C.; Perreault, E. J.; Sun, C.; Balogun, O.; Murray, W. M.

2024-12-03 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.11.29.625078 bioRxiv
Show abstract

OBJECTIVESImaging phantoms for training and validation are vital to improving the performance and adoption of ultrasound imaging modalities in clinical and pre-clinical applications, and the goal of this study was to assess the viability of 3D printed muscle ultrasound phantoms to meet this need. METHODSWe used a soft stereolithography resin to 3D print phantoms that mimicked the fascicle- and perimysium-scale structure of skeletal muscle and compared the long axis B-mode imaging quality and pattern of the phantom to that of healthy, adult Biceps brachii. We used a pulse-echo, time-of-flight method to measure the acoustic impedance of the resin for comparison to skeletal muscle and common soft tissue mimicking materials. We analyzed the echo intensity (EI) of muscle images to establish a physiological range and compared the EI of different phantom designs to assess the ability to control imaging brightness through structural modification. RESULTSA linear, striated hyper-/hypo-echoic B-mode imaging pattern mimicking long axis Biceps brachii muscle images was achieved with two 3D structure paradigms, rod and honeycomb. Acoustic impedance of Elastic 50A resin is higher than skeletal muscle in bulk, but appears suitable for use in a 3D structured phantom. EI measured in the Biceps images were found to vary both within and across images with an overall mean {+/-} SD of 87 {+/-}13 AU. EI measured in honeycomb phantoms (55 {+/-}15 AU) was higher than in rod phantoms (42 {+/-}13 AU), and a latticed honeycomb further increased EI (90 {+/-}11 AU). CONCLUSIONSThis study serves as proof-of-concept for soft, 3D printed phantoms that replicate the characteristic muscle ultrasound imaging pattern with the ability to tune clinically relevant EI values via structural design.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.