Mechanisms and attitudes in responsive health care for forced migrant communities. A qualitative study of transnational practice.
Robinson, A. R.; Khan, Z. R. A.; Broadhurst, K. A.; Nellums, L.; Renolds, G.; Payman, B.; Smith, A.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo understand the opportunities and practices that can support responsive health care for forced migrant communities. DesignQualitative study of five transnational case examples of services actively working to improve access and experiences of care for forced migrant communities. One strand of the MORRA Study. SettingFive services (Australia, Belgium, UK) providing a range of care (primary care, health advocacy, education and support, holistic health screening, care planning/coordination, transcultural mental health care). Delivered through state and not-for-profit structures in initial and contingency accommodation sites, health clinics, and community spaces. Data collection took place between July and October 2022. Participants47 participants including forced migrants using or having used one of the five services, service leads, clinical and non-clinical workers (paid and volunteer), interpreters, and service partners. Services supported recruitment of a crude representative sample of worker roles and service users/clients. Participants were required to speak one of nine languages for which we had translated study materials. Main outcome measuresExperiences, practices, knowledges, skills and attributes of workers; experiences of forced migrants engaging in services. ResultsServices showed a willingness to innovate and work outside existing practice and organisational structures, including a micro-flexibility in their interactions with patients, and through the creation of safe spaces that encouraged trust in providers. Other positive behaviours included: engaging in intercultural exchange; facilitating the connection of people with their cultural sphere (e.g. nationality, language); and a reflexive attitude to the individual and their broader circumstances. Social and political structures can diminish these efforts. ConclusionsEnvironments that enable good health and support forced migrants to live lives of meaning are vital components of responsive care. This requires flexibility and reflexivity in practice, intercultural exchange, humility, and a commitment to communication. A broader range of caring practitioners can, and should, through intentional and interconnected communities of care, contribute to the health care of forced migrants. Opening up health care systems to include other state actors such as teachers and settlement workers and a range of non-state actors that should include community leaders and peers and private players is a key step in this process. Future work should focus on the health and health service implications of immigration practices; the inclusion of peers in a range of health care roles; alliance-building across unlikely collaborators and the embedding of intercultural exchange in practice. Findings of this study are supported by our systematic review (publication forthcoming). Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIWe engaged with critical perceptions of care from across a range of international jurisdictions, community and health service contexts, and clinical and non-clinical professionalisms. C_LIO_LIA diverse and contrasting research team, including a multilingual community researcher, NHS clinicians, voluntary sector advocacy services, and academics, brought contrasting perspectives and backgrounds and broadened reflections. C_LIO_LIUnexpected restrictions (predominantly service pressures and restrictions placed by service hosts - accommodation providers) meant we engaged only a small number of service users and only with service users from some services. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 98%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 97%
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 97%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 97%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 97%
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 97%
- The public views of and reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic in England- a qualitative study with diverse ethnicities 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 96%
- The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts 96%
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 97%
- Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a mixed-methods modified grounded theory study 97%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.