An operational framework to map Essential Life Support Areas (ELSAs) for biodiversity, climate, and sustainable development
Venter, O.; Ervin, J.; Stilger Virnig, A. L.; Consaul Atkinson, S.; Marigo, M.; Zhang, D.; Supples, C.; Paniagua, E.; Phillips, L.; Schuster, R.; Llano, X.; Pence, G.; Arcese, P.; de Assis Barros, L.; Belgubayeva, A.; Borja, D.; Brumby, S.; Burgess, N. D.; Cardozo, L.; Cordero Vega, C.; Cordova, M. V.; Corzo, L.; Delgado, E.; Fonseca, C.; Game, E.; Georges, Y.; Grantham, H.; Guerra, D.; Hansen, A.; Hawley-McMaster, G.; Hout, N.; Jallah, B. S.; KC, D.; Llactayo Leon, W.; Leslie, J.; Lihong, D.; Llosa, C.; Mahmood, A. R. J.; Makholela, T.; Mathis, M.; Miller Granados, C.; McGowan, J.; Monge, R.;
Show abstract
Almost all countries are making increasingly bold commitments to halt and reverse biodiversity loss, minimise the impacts of climate change, and transition to more sustainable development. The effective achievement of many of these commitments relies on integrated spatial planning frameworks that are adaptable to national circumstances, priorities and capabilities. This need is formally recognized by Target 1 of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), which specifies that all areas should be under such planning. Here, we describe the development and application of an operational framework for national-level integrated spatial planning: Essential Life Support Areas (ELSAs). This framework facilitates the identification of areas that - if protected, restored, or sustainably managed - can support the achievement of national commitments to biodiversity, climate, and sustainable development. The process of mapping ELSAs relies heavily on leadership by national experts and stakeholders and the integration of spatial data using systematic conservation planning tools. We showcase the ELSA process carried out for Ecuador, where the use of real-time scenario analyses enabled diverse stakeholder groups to collaborate to assess national priorities for nature, climate, and sustainable development, view trade-offs and synergies, and arrive at a spatial plan to guide national action. ELSA presented an actionable approach for Ecuador, and 12 other pilot countries, to create a spatial plan aimed at fulfilling their national and international commitments to nature, including to the GBF.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Are indigenous territories effective natural climate solutions? A neotropical analysis using matching methods and geographic discontinuity designs. 92%
- Assessing the effects of agricultural intensification on natural habitats and biodiversity in Southern Amazonia 92%
- New land use change scenarios for Brazil: refining global SSPs with a regional spatially-explicit allocation model 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Land-use change from food to energy: meta-analysis unravels effects of bioenergy on biodiversity and amenity 92%
- Targeting current species ranges and carbon stocks fails to conserve biodiversity in a changing climate: opportunities to support climate adaptation under 30x30 91%
- Optimal investments in private land conservation depend more on landholder preferences than climate change 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Tailoring evidence into action: using a codesign approach for biodiversity information in the Tropical Andes 93%
- A framework for linking hemispheric, full annual cycle prioritizations to local conservation actions for migratory birds 91%
- The values of ecosystem services inside and outside of protected areas in Eastern and Southern Africa 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.