Demographic Representation of a Decentralized Long COVID Trial: A Comparison with the 2023 National Health Interview Survey
Sawano, M.; Warner, F.; Henriquez, Y.; Bhattacharjee, B.; Iwasaki, A.; Krumholz, H. M.
Show abstract
ImportanceClinical trials can be a chokepoint to progress in medicine. They are commonly expensive, slow, and not participant-centric. Ensuring patient-centric, equitable trials with diverse demographic representation is essential for developing generalizable treatments and reducing healthcare disparities. Thus, there is an urgent need to test new ways of conducting clinical trials. The PAX LC trial is a novel Phase II decentralized, digital, and participant-centric double-blind randomized trial of Paxlovid for long COVID and is a test case for a new approach. There is a need to determine how well the trial enrolled a representative population with long COVID. ObjectiveTo compare the demographic characteristics of participants in the PAX LC trial with those reported in the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to assess how well the decentralized recruitment reflects the broader population in the US with long COVID. DesignDescriptive analysis comparing 2 databases: a Phase 2, 1:1 randomized, double-blind, superiority, placebo-controlled trial conducted in community-dwelling adults with long COVID, and a nationwide observational cross-sectional survey. SettingDecentralized clinical trial with participants recruited from 48 contiguous states in the US. The NHIS survey participants were recruited from all 50 states. Participants100 highly symptomatic adults with long COVID in the PAX LC trial, compared with 575 from NHIS. Intervention(s) or Exposure(s)None. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Percentage distribution by age group, gender, race and ethnicity, and region for each group. ResultsPAX LC included 100 participants and NHIS 575, with PAX LC participants being younger (median 42 vs. 53 years). There was an equal proportion of women. Non-Hispanic White representation was higher in PAX LC (89% vs. 61% in NHIS), while the Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Black groups were underrepresented (5% vs. 20% and 1% vs. 12%, respectively). More PAX LC participants were from the Northeast (51% vs. 15%) due to earlier enrollment in this region. Conclusions and RelevanceThe PAX LC trial highlights the potential of decentralized trials to achieve geographic diversity and balanced age and gender representation. However, to maximize the benefits of this approach, further efforts are warranted to improve racial and ethnic diversity. Trial RegistrationNCT05668091.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Study protocol for the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-COV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE): a longitudinal study of the medium and long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection 93%
- Feasibility and lessons learned on remote trial implementation from TestBoston, a fully remote, longitudinal, large-scale COVID-19 surveillance study 93%
- STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: a structured protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Womens Wellness After Giving Birth Program (WWAGBP) for Vietnamese women: A single-arm trial protocol 91%
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 90%
- The PUPPY Study - Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Exploring Problems Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rationale and design of the Learning Implementation of Guideline-based decision support system for Hypertension Treatment (LIGHT) Trial and LIGHT-ACD Trial 91%
- Operational Strategies among Infectious Disease Clinical Trial Sites During Pandemics: A Scoping Review 91%
- Trials that turn from retrospectively registered to prospectively registered: A cohort study of ‘retroactively prospective’ clinical trial registration using history data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort Profile: A national prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic outcomes in the U.S. - The CHASING COVID Cohort Study 94%
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: Analysis of a COVID-19 Observational Registry for a Diverse U.S. Metropolitan Population 92%
- NIH Funding of COVID-19 Research in 2020: a Cross Sectional Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Montelukast vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients with COVID-19: The ACTIV-6 Randomized Clinical Trial 92%
- Public Preferences for Social Distancing Behaviors to Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19: A Discrete Choice Experiment 91%
- COVID-19 outcomes, risk factors and associations by race: a comprehensive analysis using electronic health records data in Michigan Medicine 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.