De novo protein-coding gene variants in developmental stuttering
Eising, E.; Dzinovic, I.; Vino, A.; Stipdonk, L.; Pavlov, M.; Winkelmann, J.; Sommer, M.; Franken, M.-C.; Oexle, K.; Fisher, S. E.
Show abstract
Stuttering is a common neurodevelopmental condition characterized by disfluencies in speech, such as blocks, prolongations, and repetitions. While most children who stutter do so only transiently, there are some for whom stuttering persists into adulthood. Rare-variant screens in families including multiple relatives with persistent stuttering have so far identified six genes carrying putative pathogenic variants hypothesized to act in a monogenic fashion. Here, we applied a complementary study design, searching instead for de novo variants in exomes of 85 independent parent-child trios, each with a child with transient or persistent stuttering. Exome sequencing analysis yielded a pathogenic variant in SPTBN1 as well as likely pathogenic variants in PRPF8, TRIO, and ZBTB7A - four genes previously implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders with or without speech problems. Our results also highlighted two further genes of interest for stuttering: FLT3 and IREB2. We used extensive bioinformatic approaches to investigate overlaps in brain-related processes among the twelve genes associated with monogenic forms of stuttering. Analyses of gene-expression datasets of the developing and adult human brain, and data from a genome-wide association study of human brain structural connectivity, did not find links of monogenic stuttering to specific brain processes. Overall, our results provide the first direct genetic link between stuttering and other neurodevelopmental disorders, including speech delay and aphasia. In addition, we systematically demonstrate a dissimilarity in biological pathways associated with the genes thus far implicated in monogenic forms of stuttering, indicating heterogeneity in the etiological basis of this condition.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Chromosome X-Wide Common Variant Association Study (XWAS) in Autism Spectrum Disorder 96%
- Loss-of-function of the Zinc Finger Homeobox 4 ( ZFHX4 ) gene underlies a neurodevelopmental disorder 94%
- A statistical method for image-mediated association studies discovers genes and pathways associated with four brain disorders 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between genes regulating neural pathways for quantitative traits of speech and language disorders 96%
- Biallelic truncation variants in ATP9A are associated with a novel autosomal recessive neurodevelopmental disorder 95%
- Comprehensive reanalysis for CNVs in ES data from unsolved rare disease cases results in new diagnoses 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of ultra-rare genetic variants in Pediatric Acute Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome (PANS) by exome and whole genome sequencing 95%
- Altered gene expression profiles impair the nervous system development in individuals with 15q13.3 microdeletion 94%
- Exome Sequencing in Individuals with Isolated Biliary Atresia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Autism spectrum disorder common variants associated with regional lobe volume variations at birth: cross-sectional study in 273 European term neonates in developing Human Connectome Project 94%
- Genomic Influences on Self-Reported Childhood Maltreatment 93%
- Convergent and distributed effects of the schizophrenia-associated 3q29 deletion on the human neural transcriptome 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- De novo FZR1 loss-of-function variants cause developmental and epileptic encephalopathies including Myoclonic Atonic Epilepsy 93%
- Cerebral Organoids Containing an AUTS2 Missense Variant Model Microcephaly 93%
- Determining pathogenicity of variants of uncertain significance and identification of a founder variant in the epilepsy-associated gene, SZT2 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.