Back

CNV-Profile Regression: A New Approach for Copy Number Variant Association Analysis in Whole Genome Sequencing Data

Si, Y.; Lu, W.; Holloway, S. T.; Wang, H.; Tucci, A. A.; Brucker, A.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, L.-S.; Schellenberg, G. D.; Lee, W.-P.; Tzeng, J.-Y.

2024-11-25 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.11.23.624994 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Copy number variants (CNVs) are DNA gains or losses involving >50 base pairs. Assessing CNV effects on disease risk requires consideration of several factors. First, there are no natural definitions for CNV loci. Second, CNV effects can depend on dosage and length. Third, CNV effects can be more accurately estimated when all CNV events in a genomic region are analyzed together to assess their joint effects. We propose a new framework for association analysis that directly models an individuals entire CNV profile within a genomic region. This framework represents an individuals CNVs using a CNV profile curve to capture variations in CNV length and dosage and to bypass the need to predefine CNV loci. CNV effects are estimated at each genome position, making the results comparable across different studies. To jointly estimate the effects of all CNVs, we use a Lasso penalty to select CNVs associated with the trait and integrate a weighted L2-fusion penalty to encourage similar effects of adjacent CNVs when supported by the data. Simulations show that the proposed model can more effectively identify causal CNVs while maintaining false positive rates comparable to baseline methods and yield more precise effect-size estimates across different settings. When applied to CNV derived from whole genome sequencing data of the Alzheimers Disease Sequencing Project, the proposed methods identify additional CNVs associated with Alzheimers Disease (AD). These identified CNVs overlap with several known AD-risk genes and are significantly enriched by biological processes related to neuron structures and functions crucial in AD development.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.