Back

Replication stress marker phospho-RPA2 predicts response to platinum and PARP inhibitors in homologous recombination-proficient ovarian cancer

Schab, A.; Compadre, A.; Drexler, R.; Loeb, M.; Rodriguez, K.; Brill, J.; Harrington, S.; Sandoval, C.; Sanders, B.; Kuroki, L.; McCourt, C.; Hagemann, A. R.; Thaker, P.; Mutch, D.; Powell, M.; Serra, V.; Hagemann, I. S.; Walts, A. E.; Karlan, B. Y.; Orsulic, S.; Fuh, K.; Sun, L.; Verma, P.; Lomonosova, E.; Zhao, P.; Khabele, D.; Mullen, M. M.

2024-11-25 cancer biology
10.1101/2024.11.21.624682 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOvarian cancer treatment includes cytoreductive surgery, platinum-based chemotherapy, and often poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Homologous recombination (HR)-deficiency is a well-established predictor of therapy sensitivity. However, over 50% of HR-proficient tumors also exhibit sensitivity to standard-of-care treatments. Currently, there are no biomarkers to identify which HR-proficient tumors will be sensitive to standard-of-care therapy. Replication stress may serve as a key determinant of response. MethodsWe evaluated phospho-RPA2-T21 (pRPA2) foci via immunofluorescence as a potential biomarker of replication stress in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples collected at diagnosis from patients treated with platinum chemotherapy (discovery cohort: n = 31, validation cohort: n = 244) or PARP inhibitors (n = 87). Recurrent tumors (n = 37) were also analyzed. pRPA2 scores were calculated using automated imaging analysis. Samples were defined as pRPA2-High if > 16% of cells had [≥] 2 pRPA2 foci. ResultsIn the discovery cohort, HR-proficient, pRPA2-High tumors demonstrated significantly higher rates of pathologic complete response to platinum chemotherapy than HR-proficient, pRPA2-Low tumors. In the validation cohort, patients with HR-proficient, pRPA2-High tumors had significantly longer survival after platinum treatment than those with HR-proficient, pRPA2-Low tumors. Additionally, the pRPA2 assay effectively predicted survival outcomes in patients treated with PARP inhibitors and in recurrent tumor samples. ConclusionOur study underscores the importance of considering replication stress markers alongside HR status in therapeutic planning. Our work suggest that this assay could be used throughout a patients treatment course to expand the number of patients receiving effective therapy while reducing unnecessary toxicity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.4%
3
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.1%
5
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
7
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
9
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
10
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
15
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
16
Cell Cycle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
22
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%