Back

Molnupiravir clinical trial simulation suggests that polymerase chain reaction underestimates antiviral potency against SARS-CoV-2

Esmaeili-Wellman, S. S.; Owens, K.; Wagoner, J.; Polyak, S. J.; Zhang, S.; Standing, J. F.; Lowe, D. M.; Schiffer, J.

2024-11-22 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.11.21.24317726
Show abstract

Molnupiravir is an antiviral medicine that induces lethal copying errors during SARS-CoV-2 RNA replication. Molnupiravir reduced hospitalization in one pivotal trial by 50% and had variable effects on reducing viral RNA levels in three separate trials. We used mathematical models to simulate these trials and closely recapitulated their virologic outcomes. Model simulations suggest lower antiviral potency against pre-omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants than against omicron. We estimate that in vitro assays underestimate in vivo potency 7-8 fold against omicron variants. Our model suggests that because polymerase chain reaction detects molnupiravir mutated variants, the true reduction in non-mutated viral RNA is underestimated by [~]0.5 log10 in the two trials conducted while omicron variants dominated. Viral area under the curve estimates differ significantly between non-mutated and mutated viral RNA. Our results reinforce past work suggesting that in vitro assays are unreliable for estimating in vivo antiviral drug potency and suggest that virologic endpoints for respiratory virus clinical trials should be catered to the drug mechanism of action.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 13%
11.0%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 3%
10.0%
3
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
based on 17 papers
Top 0.2%
4.4%
4
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 74%
4.4%
5
Science Translational Medicine
based on 40 papers
Top 0.8%
4.4%
6
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 18%
4.4%
7
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 2%
4.4%
8
New England Journal of Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 1%
2.9%
9
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 4%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
11
Science
based on 46 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 6%
2.3%
13
PLOS Biology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
2.2%
14
The Lancet Microbe
based on 33 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
15
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 11%
1.5%
16
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 13%
1.5%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 7%
1.5%
18
Med
based on 26 papers
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 23%
1.3%
20
Annals of Internal Medicine
based on 27 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Science Advances
based on 52 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
22
mBio
based on 34 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
23
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 9%
1.2%
24
American Journal of Epidemiology
based on 54 papers
Top 5%
1.2%
25
Epidemiology
based on 26 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
26
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
27
JCI Insight
based on 63 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
28
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
based on 57 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
29
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 12%
0.7%
30
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
0.7%