Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model for opportunistic calculation of Agatston score on non-gated computed tomography of the chest
McKinney, S. E.; Mercaldo, S. F.; Chin, J. K.; Ghatak, A.; Halle, M. A.; Hedgire, S. S.; Meyersohn, N. M.; Ghoshhajra, B.; Dreyer, K.; Kalra, M. K.; Bizzo, B.; Hillis, J. M.
Show abstract
ImportanceThe Agatston score is a measure of cardiovascular disease traditionally calculated on cardiac gated computed tomography (CT) of the chest. Cardiac gated CT is resource-intensive, can be hard to access, and involves extra radiation exposure. Artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to opportunistically calculate Agatston score on non-gated CTs performed for other indications. ObjectiveThis study compared the accuracy of an AI model (Riverain Technologies ClearRead CT CAC) at calculating Agatston scores on non-gated CTs to both consensus radiologist interpretations on the same CTs and Agatston scores from paired cardiac gated CTs. DesignA retrospective standalone performance assessment was conducted on a dataset of non-contrast CT chest cases acquired between January 2022 and December 2023. SettingThe study was conducted at five hospitals in the United States. ParticipantsThe cohort included non-gated CTs from 491 patients. It was enriched to ensure a representation of disease severity by selecting approximately two-thirds of patients using the originally reported Agatston score on a paired cardiac gated CT within the study timeframe. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)The study compared the agreement of Agatston categories (0, 1-99, 100-399 and [≥]400) between the AI model and ground truth radiologists or original radiology reports using the quadratic weighted Kappa coefficient. Exposure(s)Each non-gated CT case was interpreted independently by three radiologists to establish consensus interpretations. Each CT was then interpreted by the AI model. The Agatston scores for paired cardiac gated CTs were obtained from original radiology reports. ResultsThe agreement between the AI model and ground truth radiologists was 0.959 (95% CI: 0.943-0.975). This result was broadly consistent across sex, age group, race, ethnicity and CT scanner manufacturer subgroups. The agreement between the AI model and paired cardiac gated CT was 0.906 (95% CI: 0.882-0.927). Conclusions and RelevanceThe assessed AI model accurately calculated Agatston scores on non-gated CTs and produced similar scores to paired cardiac gated CTs. Its use could broaden screening for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, enabling opportunistic screening on CTs captured for other indications.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SSF2) used to demonstrate the aortic annulus on cardiac CT 95%
- Opportunistic Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Using Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography and Medical Record Data: a Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach 95%
- Inconsistency of AI in Intracranial Aneurysm Detection with Varying Dose and Image Reconstruction 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 94%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 92%
- SCU-Net: A deep learning method for segmentation and quantification of breast arterial calcifications on mammograms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 93%
- Accuracy of deep learning based computed tomography diagnostic system of COVID-19: a consecutive sampling external validation cohort study 93%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Auto-detection of motion artifacts on CT pulmonary angiograms with a physician-trained AI algorithm 97%
- Volumetric lung cancer screening reduces unnecessary low-dose computed tomography scans: results from a single-centre prospective trial on 4,119 subjects 93%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.