Multi-Scale Characterization of Distance-dependent Functional Dysconnections in Major Depressive Disorder Across Two Asian Cohorts: A Genomic, Neurochemical, and Cellular Perspective
Qian, R.; Gao, H.; Qiu, B.; Li, Z.; Gu, B.; Ye, T.; Wu, D.; zhao, z.
Show abstract
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a prevalent, chronic, and multidimensional mental disorder characterized by widespread functional dysconnectivity in the whole brain. However, the potential molecular, cellular, and neural mechanisms, contributing to the diverse symptomatology and heterogeneity of MDD remain poorly understood. This study aims to elucidate the multi-scale pathophysiological mechanisms underlying MDD subtypes by integrating functional connectivity, transcriptomic, neurotransmitter, and cell-type analyses across two Asian cohorts: the Chinese REST-meta-MDD Consortium (Discovery) and the Japanese Decoded Neurofeedback Project (Validation). The discovery cohort identified distinct patterns of distance-dependent functional connectivity strength (FCS) alterations in MDD, revealing short- to medium-range hyperconnectivity in both total MDD and recurrent MDD (RMDD) patients, with long-range hyperconnectivity specifically observed in RMDD. In contrast, first-episode drug-naive (FEDN) patients did not exhibit significant distance-dependent alterations in FCS. Genes associated with the FCS differences between FEDN and RMDD were enriched in pathways related to chemical synaptic transmission, neuron projection, and synaptic signaling. Moreover, FCS alterations in MDD subtypes were correlated with neurotransmitter receptor densities, particularly in the monoaminergic (e.g., 5HT1a, 5HT2a, and KappaOp) and GABAergic (GABAa) systems. Distinctive cell-type associations were observed, with astrocytes, endothelial cells, and oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) linked to FCS changes in RMDD, while only OPCs were associated with alterations in FEDN. The validation cohort partially replicated the key findings regarding distance-dependent FCS alterations, transcriptomic signatures, neurotransmitter associations, and cell-type specific relationships. These findings provide novel insights into the neurobiological underpinnings of functional dysconnections in MDD subtypes.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Decoding shared versus divergent transcriptomic signatures across cortico-amygdala circuitry in PTSD and depressive disorders 95%
- Subcortical brain alterations in carriers of genomic copy number variants 93%
- Regional blood flow signatures of opioidergic modulation of ketamine in major depressive disorder: a randomised crossover study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deviations from normative functioning underlying emotional episodic memory revealed cross-scale neurodiverse alterations linked to affective symptoms in distinct psychiatric disorders 96%
- Genome-wide by environment interaction study of stressful life events and hospital-treated depression in the iPSYCH2012 sample 94%
- Stable White Matter Structure in the First Three Years after Psychosis Onset 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Response to Neurofeedback in Major Depression Relates to Subtypes of Whole-Brain Activation Patterns During Training 94%
- Structural brain alterations associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviors in young people: results across 21 international studies from the ENIGMA Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviours consortium 94%
- Similarities and dissimilarities between psychiatric cluster disorders 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene expression has distinct associations with brain structure and function in major depressive disorder 97%
- Exploration of Novel Biomarkers through a Precision Medicine Approach Using Multi-omics and Brain Organoids in Patients with Atypical Depression and Psychotic Symptoms 95%
- A virtual clinical trial of psychedelics to treat patients with disorders of consciousness 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.