Back

Building a robust backbone for Astragalus (Fabaceae) using a clade-specific target enrichment bait set

Buono, D.; Kadereit, G.; Liston, A.; Zarre, S. M.; Morales-Briones, D. F.

2024-11-21 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.11.19.624276 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Premise of the studyWith over 3100 species, Astragalus (Fabaceae) has long fascinated botanists as the largest genus of flowering plants. With an origin in the Middle Miocene, Astragalus has one of the highest diversification rates known in flowering plants. Comprehensive taxonomic treatments exist, and the genus is currently subdivided into 136 sections in the Old World and 93 sections in the New World based on morphological characters. Despite considerable efforts, a comprehensive and well-resolved phylogeny of the genus is still lacking. MethodsHere, we reconstruct the backbone phylogeny of Astragalus using a custom bait set capturing 819 loci specifically designed for a target enrichment approach in the Astragalean clade. We carefully selected a set of 107 taxa representing all major clades currently recognized in Astragalus. Of those, 80 newly sequenced taxa were obtained from herbarium specimens as old as 110 years. Key resultsWe retrieved all the targeted loci and additional off-target plastome sequences for all samples, including the 80 herbarium specimens. Our phylogenetic analysis reinforced the currently accepted backbone phylogeny of Astragalus with high support and unprecedented details, additionally providing insights into cytonuclear phylogenetic conflicts in the genus. Evidence for potential reticulate evolution was found, providing a possible explanation for the conflicts observed. ConclusionsThis work represents an important milestone in obtaining a comprehensive, herbarium-based phylogeny of Astragalus, which will constitute the base to study a wealth of relevant biological questions, for example, the still unanswered question of what drove the rapid diversification of Astragalus, with important repercussions on our understanding of diversification in natural contexts.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
2
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
5
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.6%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
8
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.8%
10
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
12
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
13
Systematic Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.1%
18
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
19
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%