Back

Contributions to the force of infection of SARS-CoV-2 in Dutch long-term care facilities

de Wit, M. M.; van Zelst, M.; Boere, T. M.; van Gaalen, R. D.; de Jong, M. C. M.; van Hoek, A. J.; ten Bosch, Q.

2024-11-25 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.11.19.24316339
Show abstract

BackgroundResidents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) have been disproportionately affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. To inform decision-making around interventions, we quantified the SARS-CoV-2 infection risk for residents and the relative contribution of different infection sources. We estimated the force of infection (FOI) experienced by Dutch LTCF residents over time and quantified the contribution of residents, LTCF healthcare workers (HCWs), and the general population. Methods & findingsCase data were obtained by Municipal Health Services as part of the Dutch national surveillance program. During the study period (1 October 2020 to 10 November 2021), testing policies included symptom-based testing, exposure-based testing, and facility-wide serial testing. We used a data augmentation approach to include uncertainty in the timing of infection, while taking account of different testing policies. We constructed a Bayesian generalized linear model to estimate group-specific transmission rate parameters and contributions to the FOI experienced by residents. During the study period 36,877 cases were registered among residents and 19,676 among HCWs. The total daily FOI towards residents was highest in December 2020 (1.7*10-3, 95% CI: 1.5*10-3 - 1.9*10-3) and lowest in June 2021 (1.1*10-5 95%CI: 7.6*10-6 - 1.7*10-5). Resident-directed type-reproduction numbers and FOI declined as COVID-19 vaccination rollout started in residents, HCWs, and the older general population (February-May 2021). Most resident infections in spring and summer 2021 were attributable to infections in the general population. The relative contribution of the general population to the FOI decreased in summer 2021 when vaccination was available population-wide. In October-November 2021, type-reproduction numbers and FOI increased again. We observed an increase in residents susceptibility to infection in this period, which was only partially explained by the emergence of the Delta variant. Sensitivity analyses showed that the temporal trends in relative contributions to the FOI were not impacted by assumptions about immunity build-up among residents, nor by underreporting of infections. ConclusionsCOVID-19 vaccination appears to have been effective in reducing SARS-CoV-2 transmission towards residents, although other factors such as seasonality or non-pharmaceutical interventions may also have contributed to this. This effect seemed to have decreased by autumn 2021, which could be due to waning of immunity or changes in control practices. Our estimates of temporal trends in relative contributions to the FOI in LTCF residents can help target intervention efforts.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 1.0%
15.2%
2
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 0.4%
10.1%
4
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 0.8%
8.2%
5
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 3%
2.9%
6
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 23%
2.8%
7
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 3%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 8%
2.8%
9
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
based on 57 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
11
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 4%
2.4%
12
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 5%
2.3%
13
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 86%
2.3%
14
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 7%
2.2%
15
The Lancet Public Health
based on 20 papers
Top 0.4%
1.8%
16
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
based on 36 papers
Top 0.6%
1.6%
17
American Journal of Epidemiology
based on 54 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
18
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 6%
1.3%
19
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
20
Vaccine
based on 140 papers
Top 4%
1.2%
21
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 15%
1.2%
22
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 80%
1.2%
23
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 15%
0.8%
24
Epidemics
based on 96 papers
Top 7%
0.8%