Back

The MobiliseMe study: A randomised controlled efficacy trial of a cognitive behavioural therapy smartphone application (ClearlyMe(R)) for reducing depressive symptoms in adolescents.

O'Dea, B.; Li, S. H.; Subotic-Kerry, M.; Achilles, M. R.; Mackinnon, A. J.; Batterham, P. J.; Christensen, H.; Roberts, A.; Nagendraprasad, K.; Dudley, Z.; Gillham, B.; Werner-Seidler, A.

2024-11-22 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.11.17.24317363 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe effectiveness of Digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (dCBT) smartphone applications for reducing depressive symptoms in adolescents remain unclear. MethodsAn online three-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of a CBT smartphone application (ClearlyMe(R)) for reducing depressive symptoms in adolescents with outcomes assessed at baseline, post intervention (primary endpoint: 6-weeks post baseline) and follow-up (secondary endpoint: 4-months post baseline). The University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee provided ethical approval. Youth were eligible if they were aged 12 to 17 years, in Australia, had mild to moderate depressive symptoms as measured by the adolescent Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-A), were not receiving treatment or experiencing recent or severe suicidality, had access to a smartphone, and parental consent. Participants were randomised to self-directed ClearlyMe(R), ClearlyMe(R) with SMS-guided support, or the attention-matched control. Participants were not directly informed of their allocation. The statistician was blinded for analysis. The primary outcome was PHQ-A change post intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses used mixed models for repeated measures. The trial was prospectively registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000131752). Outcomes569 adolescents (Mean age: 15.89, SD: 1.26, 74.2% female) were included in the analyses. The self-directed and guided conditions showed significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms post intervention than the control (self-directed: Cohens d=0.35, mean differential decline 1.77; 95%CI: 0.56 - 2.98; P=.004; guided: d=0.33, mean differential decline: 1.31; 95%CI: 0.12 - 2.49; P=.030). The effects of self-directed and guided were comparable. Effects were also more robust and substantially larger post intervention among adolescents with probable MDD at baseline. Secondary outcomes showed similar patterns of change, although no differential effects for anxiety. There were no differences between the conditions at follow-up for any outcomes. Risk of adverse events was almost double in controls compared to self-directed (IRR: 1.73, 95%CI: 1.15 - 2.62, P=.009) and guided (IRR: 1.98 (95%CI: 1.27 - 3.08, P=.002). InterpretationClearlyMe(R), self-directed or with SMS-guided support, was effective for the short-term reduction of depressive symptoms in adolescents who have mild to moderate depression and are not receiving any other treatment. FundingThe Goodman Foundation and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grants (MRF1197249, GNT2008839, GNT115614).

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
3
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.8%
6
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
8
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
12
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
25
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%