Environmental and social impact assessment in healthcare business planning: a national survey of NHS trusts in England
Takahashi, H.; Kudsk-Iversen, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundDecision-making in healthcare should include considerations for its environmental and social consequences as well as clinical and financial. Business cases represent projects which are likely to have particularly high impact, in which performing an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment may reduce negative effects. The practice of assessing these impacts is not mandatory, therefore our aim was to determine to what extent environmental and social considerations are incorporated into business planning across NHS trusts in England. We also set out to identify examples of good practice, common challenges and possible solutions to overcome these. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey across trusts in NHS England to capture current practice. This was carried out online between April and July 2024. ResultsNinety seven out of 210 trusts (46%) responded to the survey. Thirty two currently assess the environmental and/or social impact of their business cases and 25 are in the process of doing so, illustrating a growing practice. There is significant variation between trusts in terms of content, format and process of the assessment. DiscussionThis was the first study to portray not only whether and how environmental and social impacts are assessed in NHS business planning, but also the barriers and potential solutions in embedding this assessment. The variation in practice signifies heterogeneity of NHS trusts and there is unlikely to be a single tool that would suit every organisation. An impact assessment process with a clear purpose, that reflects organisational values, and is supported by multidisciplinary expertise is likely to be more meaningful. We include an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment tool for our trust, which has been developed based on the learning points from this study and modified to our trusts needs, as an example.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 93%
- Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23 93%
- Beyond social prescribing - the use of social return on investment (SROI) analysis in integrated health and social care interventions in England and Wales: a protocol for a systematic review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 92%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 92%
- Mapping factors that may influence attrition and retention of midwives: a scoping review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Leading from the front’ implementation strategies increase the success of influenza vaccination drives among healthcare workers: A reanalysis of Systematic Review evidence using Intervention Component Analysis (ICA) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) 92%
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 92%
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- How best do we engage the general population in testing for COVID-19? 91%
- A whole system approach to increasing children’s physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol 91%
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 91%
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 91%
- Subnational tailoring of malaria interventions for strategic planning and prioritization: experience and perspectives of five malaria programs 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.