Back

Diagnostic-avoiding Chlamydia trachomatis variants detected in cervical and endometrial specimens from women during 16S microbiome profiling

Jeong, S.; Tollison, T.; Brochu, H.; Chou, H.; Yu, T.; Baghaie, P.; Yount, K. S.; Darville, T.; Wiesenfeld, H. C.; Hillier, S. L.; Peng, X.; O'Connell, C. M.

2024-12-07 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.11.13.24316066 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPerformance of a 16S rRNA analysis of the cervicovaginal microbiome of 220 participants recruited into the T Cell Response against Chlamydia (TRAC) cohort between February 2011 and August 2014 in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania USA detected DNA encoding chlamydial 16S rRNA in samples from seven participants whose tests were negative for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and DNA encoding gonococcal 16S rRNA from five participants whose tests were negative for Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infection with the Aptima Combo2 assay (Hologic). MethodsWe used targeted PCR amplification followed by sequencing to characterize the chlamydial 23S rRNA locus and qPCR to detect gonococcal DNA in residual diagnostic swab eluates or DNA used to generate 16S rRNA libraries. ResultsDiscrepant specimens that contained chlamydial DNA carried a diagnostic-avoidant, G1526A variant in the 23S rRNA locus identical to variants previously detected in Finland, Denmark, and the UK. PCR validation of gonococcal DNA was confirmed for all participants whose tests were negative, with stochastic effects consistent with infection levels close to the limit of detection by the diagnostic assay. ConclusionsThese data indicate that this probe-avoidant CT mutant, and possibly others, were circulating in the northeastern US prior to their detection and characterization in 2019. Although infrequent, documentation of false negative results for CT indicates a need for clinicians to consider performance of a second test that uses alternate PCR targets if patients have persistent symptoms or have known contact to an infected sex partner and their initial NAAT is negative.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.