AlphaRING-X: accurate interpretation of missense variant deleteriousness based on protein structural stability
Mamane-Logsdon, A.; Safari, R.; Barnard, A.; Maertens, G. N.; Bellos, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccurate interpretation of missense variants remains a significant challenge hindering genomic diagnosis. While state-of-the-art machine learning and deep learning predictors offer high accuracy, they often lack the transparency required for clinical evidence weighting. To bridge this gap between accuracy and clinical utility, we developed AlphaRING-X. MethodsAlphaRING-X is an open-source framework that integrates local and global protein structural stability features using an efficient implementation of gradient boosting, XGBoost, to predict variant deleteriousness. Local stability is interrogated through a combination of AlphaFold-based modelling and residue interaction network analysis. Changes in global stability upon mutation ({Delta}{Delta}G) are estimated using FoldX. For each prediction, AlphaRING-X quantifies the magnitude and direction of each features contribution using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), providing a unified yet interpretable score. We trained and evaluated the model using a gold standard ClinVar dataset of validated neutral and deleterious variants. ResultsAlphaRING-X achieved an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.94, significantly outperforming widely used predictors such as CADD. Crucially, it provided unambiguous classification for 95.5% of variants at 90% precision in both neutral and deleterious classes. We analysed each predictions SHAP values, identifying local connectivity and disorder as the strongest contributors. ConclusionsAlphaRING-X combines high-performance prediction with the interpretability necessary for clinical decision-making. Its flexible, open-source architecture makes it a powerful, transparent tool for enhancing genomic diagnostics and advancing precision medicine.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- StabilitySort: assessment of protein stability changes on a genome-wide scale to prioritise potentially pathogenic genetic variation 96%
- Rhapsody: Pathogenicity prediction of human missense variants based on protein sequence, structure and dynamics 95%
- DrivR-Base: A Feature Extraction Toolkit For Variant Effect Prediction Model Construction 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.