Back

Factors affecting antenatal corticosteroid use in low- and middle-income countries: facility characteristics, structural readiness, and past performance of CEmONC signal functions

Yang, W.-C.; Arsenault, C.; Fan, V. Y.; Ali, N. B.; Alwy Al-beity, F. M.; Smith, E. R.

2024-11-12 public and global health
10.1101/2024.11.12.24317172 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAntenatal corticosteroids (ACS) utilization is disproportionately limited in low- and middle-income countries where most global preterm newborns who could benefit from this intervention are born. Understanding the factors affecting ACS use is crucial for improving its uptake. This study aimed to investigate facility-level factors associated with ACS use in low-resource countries. MethodsWe used data from ten Service Provision Assessment surveys across nine countries. We restricted the sample to facilities that provided delivery services. Our primary outcome was recent ACS use, defined as having administered ACS within the past three months before the survey. We conducted mixed-effect log binomial regressions, with country as a fixed effect and sub-national regions as random intercepts, to explore the association between recent ACS use and facility characteristics, injectable corticosteroids and ultrasound availability, facility structural readiness, and past performance of nine Comprehensive Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (CEmONC) signal functions. ResultsThis study included 6183 facilities from nine countries. Across eight countries with nationally representative data, only 22.7% (median, range 4.0% to 27.4%) of facilities that provided delivery services had used ACS recently. Urban facilities had a 21% higher likelihood of recent ACS use (95% CI 6%-38%) than rural facilities. Corticosteroid availability was associated with a 14% higher likelihood of recent ACS use (95% CI 1%-29%). Facilities in the highest readiness tertile were more likely to have recent ACS use than those in the lowest (RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.58-2.30). Each CEmONC signal function, except for assisted vaginal deliveries, was significantly associated with recent ACS use, with neonatal resuscitation having the largest effect (RR 2.62, 95% CI 1.93-3.55). ConclusionFacilities that had performed CEmONC services were more likely to administer ACS, highlighting the importance of provider knowledge, skills, and competence in managing obstetric and newborn emergencies for effective ACS provision.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
10.4%
2
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.2%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
6
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
7
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
16
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
23
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%