Back

Descriptive epidemiology of COVID-19 outcomes in England, from September 2023 to April 2024

Abdul Aziz, N.; Allen, H.; Assaraf, K.; Dabrera, G.; Ramsay, M.; Allen, A.

2024-11-13 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.11.12.24317146 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionCOVID-19 disease has been associated with severe illness, hospitalisation and death, however, widespread vaccination coverage in England has resulted in reduced disease severity. From 2022, the national vaccination programme has been run twice per year, prioritising older age groups or those classified as clinically vulnerable. Here we assess the trends in COVID-19 outcomes between September 2023 and April 2024, using national-level data held by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). MethodsData linkage of national-level COVID-19 episode data, NHS emergency and hospital attendance data, and death registrations were used to analyse COVID-19 outcomes. Outcomes were defined as COVID-19 associated A&E attendances, hospital admissions, severe hospitalisations, and deaths. The number and rate of each COVID-19 outcome category between September 2023 and April 2024 was calculated, stratified by clinical risk status and age and sex. ResultsThe most common COVID-19 outcomes during this time-period were A&E attendance and hospital admission, with the rates highest among those aged 75 and over. Among this age group, all outcomes disproportionately affect those who have been identified as at clinical risk and those who were immunosuppressed. High rates of A&E attendance and hospital admission were also observed among infants (under 6 months old) but were lower for more severe outcomes. DiscussionGroups that were most affected by COVID-19 outcomes were currently prioritised for COVID-19 vaccination in England, which will help protect against more severe outcomes including admission to intensive care and death. Routine national levels surveillance of COVID-19 outcomes is essential to monitor populations most of severe disease and informing vaccination policy.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.