Back

Simulating Offshore Oilfield Conditions: Insights into Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion from a Dual Anaerobic Biofilm Reactor

Jones, L. M.; Salta, M.; Lund Skovhus, T.; Thomas, K.; Illson, T.; Wharton, J. A.; Webb, J. S.

2024-11-11 microbiology
10.1101/2024.11.11.622982 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Oilfield systems are a multifaceted ecological niche which consistently experience microbiologically influenced corrosion. However, simulating environmental conditions of an offshore system within the laboratory is notoriously difficult. A novel dual anaerobic biofilm reactor protocol allowed a complex mixed-species marine biofilm to be studied. Interestingly, electroactive corrosive bacteria and fermentative electroactive bacteria growth was supported within the biofilm microenvironment. Critically, the biotic condition exhibited pits with a greater average area which is characteristic of microbiologically influenced corrosion. This research seeks to bridge the gap between experimental and real-world scenarios, ultimately enhancing the reliability of biofilm management strategies in the industry. ImportanceIt is becoming more widely understood that any investigation of microbiologically influenced corrosion requires a multidisciplinary focus on multiple lines of evidence. While there are numerous standards available to guide specific types of testing, there are none that focus on integrating biofilm testing. By developing a novel dual anaerobic reactor model to study biofilms, insights into the different abiotic and biotic corrosion mechanisms under relevant environmental conditions can be gained. Using multiple lines of evidence to gain a holistic understanding, more sustainable prevention and mitigation strategies can be designed. To our knowledge, this is the first time all these metrics have been combined in one unified approach. The overall aim for this paper is to explore recent advances in biofilm testing and corrosion research, to provide recommendations for future standards being drafted. However, it is important to note that this article itself is not intending to serve as a standard.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.