Back

Urban Cohabscapes: exploring European Co-Habitative landScapes diversity, in the ECOLOPES framework.

Oneto, G.; Perini, K.; Canepa, M.; Culshaw, V.; Weisser, W.; Mimet, A.

2024-11-13 ecology
10.1101/2024.11.11.622937 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Urban liveability is closely related to the landscape features that support human societies. The promotion of liveability influences the well-being of both human and non-human inhabitants of the city, as the two share the same urban habitat. In this paper, we propose a classification of urban landscapes tailored to facilitate the acquisition of interdisciplinary knowledge on the multi-inhabitant liveability of urban landscapes. Our classification represents the layered urban dimensions through four different subclassifications: local and landscape Urban Form, Anthropic Imprint, and Biophysical Conditions. We developed a flexible and scalable methodology that enables us to expand to other cities, by using only opensource geospatial and remote sensing data. We modelled our four subclassifications at 10-metres through a set of automatic pipelines, running Principal Component Analysis as dimensionality reduction and KMeans unsupervised classification. In this paper we explore the application of our methodology in the framework of ECOLOPES, a project that investigates the human and non-human liveability in cities through the computational design of green building envelopes. We apply the methodology to three distinct European cities, i.e. Vienna, Munich, and Genoa. We produced a set of 12 raster maps from 64 variables, with a total of 32 classes and 1264 possible combinations. We analysed inter and intra-urban class frequencies by highlighting the primary spatial signatures over each sub-classification, and between the overall Functional Urban Areas and the core areas. In this paper we discuss how this approach could foster multidisciplinary studies on urban liveability that hold into account not just humans, but all living inhabitants in cities. From this application, we envision a second step where our methodology will be applied to the full extent of European cities.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
26.5%
2
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
3
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
4
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
5.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
9
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
19
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
20
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
21
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
26
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
29
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%