Multi-stain modelling of histopathology slides for breast cancer prognosis prediction
Sharma, A.; Gustafsson, F. K.; Hartman, J.; Rantalainen, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundPathologic assessment of the established biomarkers using standard hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical (IHC) stained whole slide images (WSIs) is central in routine breast cancer diagnostics and contributes prognostic and predictive information that guides clinical decision-making. However, other than only aggregated protein-expression values from IHC WSIs, a spatial combination of histo-morphological information from IHC and H&E WSIs can potentially improve prognosis prediction in breast cancer patients. In this study, we aim to develop a deep learning-based risk-stratification method for breast cancer using routine H&E and IHC-stained histopathology WSIs from resected tumours. MethodsThis is a retrospective study including WSIs from surgical resected specimens from 945 patients from the South General Hospital in Stockholm. One H&E and four IHC (ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67) stained sections were included from each patient, retrieved from the same tumour block. The IHC WSIs with the H&E WSI were registered, and corresponding images patches (tiles) were extracted for each image modality. Features from the registered tiles were extracted using two existing and publicly available histopathology foundation models (UNI and CONCH). Using the extracted features together with time-to-event data, we optimised an attention-based multiple instance learning (MIL) model using the Cox loss (negative partial log-likelihood loss) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) as the survival endpoint. ResultsUsing cross-validation we observed a prognostic performance with a C-index of 0.65 (95%CI: 0.56 - 0.72) for the risk score prediction using only H&E WSIs and UNI as the tile-level feature extractor. Combinations of H&E with one or more IHC modalities were subsequently evaluated, with the highest performance observed in the model combining the H&E and PR WSI data and the model combining all the stains, obtaining a C-index of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.65 - 0.79) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64 - 0.79) respectively. ConclusionMultiple stain modalities are used in routine breast cancer pathology, but has not been considered together for prognostic modelling. The results in this study suggests that models combining morphological features extracted by histopathology foundation models across multiple stain modalities can improve prognostic risk-stratification performance compared to single-modality models.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Bladder Cancer Prognosis Using Deep Neural Networks and Histopathology Images 95%
- Independent assessment of a deep learning system for lymph node metastasis detection on the Augmented Reality Microscope 95%
- Quantification of HER2-low and ultra-low expression in breast cancer specimens by quantitative IHC and artificial intelligence 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Attention-based whole-slide image compression achieves pathologist-level pre-screening of multi-organ routine histopathology biopsies 95%
- Genomic Characterization of Lung Cancer in Never-Smokers Using Deep Learning 95%
- Clinical-Grade Validation of an Autofluorescence Virtual Staining System with Human Experts and a Deep Learning System for Prostate Cancer 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Weakly supervised learning for multi-organ adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images 95%
- Pixelwise H-score: a novel digital image analysis based-metric to quantify membrane biomarker expression from immunohistochemistry images 95%
- Automated Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma Grade Classification with Prognostic Significance 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated detection of the HER2 gene amplification status in Fluorescence in situ hybridization images for the diagnostics of cancer tissues 95%
- Automated and Manual Quantification of Tumour Cellularity in Digital Slides for Tumour Burden Assessment 95%
- Reproducible And Clinically Translatable Deep Neural Networks For Cervical Screening 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 95%
- Deep learning models for poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images using transfer learning 94%
- The NILS study protocol - a retrospective validation study of a preoperative decision-making tool for non-invasive lymph node staging in women with primary breast cancer [ISRCTN14341750] 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.