Back

Frequency Specificity Of Narrowband Chirps And 2-1-2 Stimuli: Spectral Analyses

Adjekum, R. N.; Small, S. A.; Chan, S.; Stapells, D. R.

2024-11-10 otolaryngology
10.1101/2024.11.09.24317036 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe current study examined the frequency specificity of NB chirps by comparing the spectral characteristics of 500-, 1000-, 2000- and 4000-Hz NB CE-Chirp(R) LS stimuli with those of 2-1-2 tones. DesignSpectral characteristics including the centre frequency, bandwidth, and stimulus energy changes after stopband filtering were compared. The bandwidth was computed as the difference between the upper and lower frequencies at -20 dB (& -3 dB) cutoff points of the main lobe; the centre frequency was determined as the geometric mean of the upper and lower frequencies at the -20 dB (& -3 dB) cutoff points. ResultsAt 100 dB peSPL, the bandwidths of the 500-, 1000-, and 2000-Hz NB CE-Chirp(R) LS acoustic spectra were 1.7-2.5 times wider than the acoustic spectra for the 2-1-2 tones; the 4000-Hz NB CE-Chirp(R) LS bandwidths were 1.4-1.6 times wider than those of the 2-1-2 tones. The energy of NB CE-Chirp(R) LS stimuli was concentrated within {+/-}0.75 octave of the centre frequency, compared to {+/-}0.5 octave for 2-1-2 tones. ConclusionNB CE-Chirp(R) LS stimuli demonstrated poorer frequency specificity compared with 2-1-2 tones. Further studies are needed to investigate the place specificity of the ABRs to NB CE-Chirp(R) LS before implementing them clinically.

Published in American Journal of Audiology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.