PLM-interact: extending protein language models to predict protein-protein interactions
Liu, D.; Young, F.; Lamb, K. D.; Claudio Quiros, A.; Pancheva, A.; Miller, C.; Macdonald, C.; Robertson, D. L.; Yuan, K.
Show abstract
Computational prediction of protein structure from amino acid sequences alone has been achieved with unprecedented accuracy, yet the prediction of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) remains an outstanding challenge. Here we assess the ability of protein language models (PLMs), routinely applied to protein folding, to be retrained for PPI prediction. Existing PPI prediction models that exploit PLMs use a pre-trained PLM feature set, ignoring that the proteins are physically interacting. Our novel method, PLM-interact, goes beyond a single protein, jointly encoding protein pairs to learn their relationships, analogous to the next-sentence prediction task from natural language processing. This approach provides a significant improvement in performance: Trained on human-human PPIs, PLM-interact predicts mouse, fly, worm, E. coli and yeast PPIs, with 16-28% improvements in AUPR compared with state-of-the-art PPI models. Additionally, it can detect changes that disrupt or cause PPIs and be applied to virus-host PPI prediction. Our work demonstrates that large language models can be extended to learn the intricate relationships among biomolecules from their sequences alone.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- CaLMPhosKAN: Prediction of General Phosphorylation Sites in Proteins via Fusion of Codon Aware Embeddings with Amino Acid Aware Embeddings and Wavelet-based Kolmogorov Arnold Network 95%
- PIPENN: Protein Interface Prediction with an Ensemble of Neural Nets 95%
- Inference of genome 3D architecture by modeling overdispersion of Hi-C data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.