Evaluation of DNA-poli: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial to assess a digital platform for family cascade genetic testing and predictive genetic counselling
van Lingen, M. N.; Meulenkamp, J. V.; Siemelink, M. A.; Beinema, T. C.; Klaassen, R.; Heylen, D. K. J.; van Tintelen, J. P.; van den Heuvel, L. M.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe present uptake of predictive genetic counselling among at-risk relatives (ARRs) for cardiogenetic diseases is suboptimal with 40-50% of ARRs being tested after one to three years post- disclosure. Digital technologies are increasingly proposed to improve accessibility, efficiency, and uptake of predictive genetic counselling and, if desired, predictive genetic testing. Therefore, DNA- poli was developed: a digital platform providing family communication support and pre- and post-test genetic counselling for ARRs. The online DNA-poli aims to decrease the threshold for ARRs to seek genetic counselling without compromising the quality of care while increasing the efficiency of genetic care. Here, we describe the study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating DNA- poli in clinical practice. Methods and analysisA non-inferiority multicentre randomised controlled trial with parallel-group design will be conducted. The intervention group using the DNA-poli platform will be compared to a control group receiving regular counselling. Probands with hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy in whom a (likely) pathogenic variant in specific genes with definitive gene-disease validity is identified, will be included like their ARRs and physicians. The primary outcome is the uptake of cardiogenetic counselling six months post-disclosure with an extended follow-up of one year and stakeholders experiences. Secondary outcomes are informed decision-making in ARRs, empowerment, and the satisfaction of all stakeholder groups. In addition, the efficiency of consultations and the genetic care process will be analysed. Descriptive and inferential statistics will be performed to analyse data. Ethics and disseminationThis study protocol was exempted from approval by the Medical Ethical Committee NedMec because the Act of Medical Research Involving Human Subject (WMO) was not applicable (no. 23-066/C). Study findings will be shared with stakeholders, published in journals, and will be presented at both international and national conferences. Registration details NCT06431425 ClinicalTrials.gov
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The NYCKidSeq project: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial incorporating genomics into the clinical care of diverse New York City children 92%
- The Melanoma Genomics Managing Your Risk Study randomised controlled trial: Statistical Analysis Plan 91%
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): Protocol of a cluster randomised controlled equivalence trial of prescribing policy to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and evaluation of a novel educational program for providers on the use of polygenic risk scores 94%
- GUIA: a digital platform to facilitate result disclosure in genetic counseling 93%
- Systematic assessment of outcomes following a genetic diagnosis identified through a large-scale research study into developmental disorders 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 93%
- A Qualitative Study Exploring the Consumer Experience of Receiving Self-Initiated Polygenic Risk Scores from a Third-Party Website 92%
- Analysis of large-language model versus human performance for genetics questions 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- ChatGPT- versus human-generated answers to frequently asked questions about diabetes: a Turing test-inspired survey among employees of a Danish diabetes center 92%
- Feedback of Individual Genetic and Genomics Research Results: A Qualitative Study Involving Grassroots Communities in Uganda 91%
- Evaluation of a novel community-based COVID-19 'Test-to-Care model' for low-income populations 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Co-designing an online COmmunity suPporting familiEs after Sudden Cardiac Death (COPE-SCD) in the young 92%
- Re-contacting biobank participants: lessons from a pilot study within FinnGen 92%
- Understanding preferences for self-sampling in a national cervical screening programme: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.