Polygenic risk scores for precision psychiatry: a study on the effect heterogeneity of antidepressants
Goto, R.; Naito, T.; Skokauskas, N.; Inoue, K.
Show abstract
Depression continues to be a major contributor to the global burden of diseases. Antide-pressants are recommended as the initial choice of treatment for moderate and severe depression among adults, but the choice of antidepressant class can be challenging, as efficacies of commonly used antidepressants are generally comparable between classes. As such, to determine which medication to prescribe to each patient, clinicians often rely on the adverse effect profile of antidepressants. One of the most discussed adverse effects is the possibility of increased suicidality with antidepressant initiation, a rare but serious adverse event. Efforts to predict this have mostly relied on clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of patients, but we do not yet have a clear picture. A promising avenue is to use patients genetic data, but the evidence on its utility has so far been mixed, and few large scale databases have both clinical and genetic data that can evaluate its utility. Here, using genetic and clinical data on more than 7,000 patients, both children and adults, with major depressive disorder from the All of Us Research Program, we show that the genetic predisposition for psychiatric disorders may underlie the substantial heterogeneity in the risk of suicidal thoughts with antidepressant use. Specifically, using a target trial emulation framework, we show that patients with higher polygenic scores for psychiatric disorders, particularly for attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder, may be more likely than those with lower scores to experience suicidal thoughts with the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, relative to bupropion. In the personalized medicine framework, PGSs for various psychiatric disorders may help tailor antidepressants to each patient to avoid serious adverse effects such as suicidal thoughts.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between Psychotropic Medications Functionally Inhibiting Acid Sphingomyelinase and reduced risk of Intubation or Death among Individuals with Mental Disorder and Severe COVID-19: an Observational Study 94%
- Neurovegetative symptom subtypes in young people with major depressive disorder and their structural brain correlates 94%
- Predicting remission after internet-delivered psychotherapy in patients with depression using machine learning and multi-modal data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the direct effects of the genetic liabilities to bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and behavioral traits on suicide attempt using a multivariable Mendelian randomization approach 92%
- Neurocognitive and Functional Heterogeneity in Depressed Youth 92%
- Sensitive period-regulating genetic pathways and exposure to adversity shape risk for depression 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sequential Bilateral Accelerated Theta Burst Stimulation in Adolescents With Suicidal Ideation Associated With Major Depressive Disorder: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Predicting intentions towards long-term antidepressant use in the management of people with depression in primary care: A longitudinal survey study 94%
- Pharmacotherapy, drug-drug interactions and potentially inappropriate medication in depressive disorders 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy with antidepressant treatment in patients with treatment-resistant depression in Japan 93%
- Absence of nonfatal suicidal behavior preceding suicide death reveals differences in clinical risks 93%
- The Relationship between Cannabis Use and Cognition in People with Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Scoping Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.