Back

Using Sputum And Tongue Swab Specimens For In-Home Point-Of-Care Targeted Universal Testing For TB Of Household Contacts: An Acceptability And Feasibility Analysis

Bezuidenhout, C.; Long, L.; Nichols, B. E.; Meyer-Rath, G.; Fox, M. P.; Olifant, S.; Theron, G.; Fiphaza, K.; Ruhwald, M.; Penn-Nicholson, A.; Fourie, B.; Medina-Marino, A.

2024-11-02 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.11.01.24316570 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionEffective strategies are needed to facilitate early detection and diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). The over-reliance on passive case detection, symptom screening, and collection of sputum, results in delayed or undiagnosed TB, which directly contributes to on-going TB transmission. We assessed the acceptability and feasibility of in-home, Targeted Universal TB Testing (TUTT) of household contacts using GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra at point-of-care (POC) during household contact investigations (HCIs) and compared the feasibility of using sputum vs. tongue swab specimens. MethodsHousehold contacts (HHCs) receiving in-home POC TUTT as part of the TB Home Study were asked to complete a post-test acceptability survey. The survey explored HHCs level of comfort, confidence in the test results, and the perceived appropriateness of in-home POC TUTT. We used the Metrics to Assess the Feasibility of Rapid Point-of-Care Technologies framework to assess the feasibility of using sputum and tongue swab specimens for in-home POC TUTT. Descriptive statistics were used to report participant responses and feasibility metrics. ResultsOf 313 eligible HHCs, 267/313 (85.3%) consented to in-home POC TUTT. Of those, 267/267 (100%) provided a tongue swab and 46/267 (17.2%) could expectorate sputum. All specimens were successfully prepared for immediate, in-home testing with Xpert Ultra on GeneXpert Edge. Of 164 tongue swab tests conducted, 160/164 (97.6%) generated a valid test result compared to 44/46 (95.7%) sputum-based tests. An immediate test result was available for 262/267 (98.1%) individuals based on in-home swab testing, and 44/46 (95.7%) based on in-home sputum testing. The mean in-home POC TUTT acceptability score (5=highly acceptable) was 4.5/5 (SD= 0.2). ConclusionIn-home, POC TUTT using either sputum or tongue swab specimens was highly acceptable and feasible. Tongue swab specimens greatly increase the proportion of HHCs tested compared to sputum. In-home POC TUTT using a combination of sputum and tongue swabs can mitigate shortcomings to case detection. KEY MESSAGE What is already known on this topicO_LITB transmission among household contacts of people with TB is a public health concern. C_LIO_LIThe delivery of community-based diagnostic testing for TB is challenging and the reliance on sputum continue to hamper universal testing and result in diagnostic delay. C_LI What this study addsO_LIThis is the first study to assess the acceptability of universal in-home point-of-care TB testing of household contacts during household contact investigations. C_LIO_LIThis study assesses the feasibility of different specimen types for immediate in-home point-of-care TB testing including tongue swabs and sputum. C_LI How this study might affect research, practice or policyO_LIHousehold contacts perceived in-home targeted universal TB testing to be highly acceptable, prompting the need for further investigation into the cost-effectiveness of such strategies to improve early case detection. C_LIO_LIThe use of tongue swabs as an additional or alternative sample type to sputum could increase testing and improve early case detection. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.