Back

SpaMTP: Integrative Statistical Analysis and Visualisation of Spatial Metabolomics and Transcriptomics data.

Causer, A.; Lu, T.; Fitzgerald, C.; Newman, A.; Vu, H.; Tan, X.; Vo, T. Q. A.; Cui, C.; Narayana, V. K.; Whittle, J. R.; Best, S. A.; Freytag, S.; Nguyen, Q.

2024-11-03 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.10.31.621429 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ability to spatially measure multi-modal data provides an unprecedented opportunity to comprehensively explore molecular regulation at transcriptional, translational and metabolic levels to acquire insights on cellular activities underpinning health and disease. However, there is currently a lack of analytical tools to integrate complementary information across different spatial-omics data modalities, particularly with respect to spatial metabolomics data, which is becoming increasingly invaluable. We introduce SpaMTP, a versatile software that implements an end-to-end integrative analysis of spatial metabolomics and transcriptomics data. Based in R, SpaMTP bridges processing functionalities for metabolomics data from Cardinal with user-friendly cell-centric analyses implemented in Seurat. Furthermore, SpaMTPs comprehensive analysis pipeline covers (1) automated mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) metabolite annotation; (2) a wide range of metabolite-gene based downstream statistical analyses including differential expression, pathway analysis, and correlation analysis; (3) integrative spatial-omics analysis; and (4) a suite of visualisation functions. For flexibility and interoperability, SpaMTP includes various functions for data import/export and object conversion, enabling seamless integration with other R and Python packages. We demonstrated the utility of SpaMTP to draw new biological understandings through analysing two biological system. We believe this software and implemented methods will be broadly utilised in spatial multi-omics and spatial metabolomics analyses.

Published in Nature Methods (predicted rank #17) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.