BTS: scalable Bayesian Tissue Score for prioritizing GWAS variants and their functional contexts across omics data
Kuksa, P. P.; Ionita, M.; Carter, L. J.; Cifello, J.; Clark, K.; Valladares, O.; Leung, Y. Y.; Wang, L.-S.
Show abstract
MotivationSummary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are widely used in fine-mapping and colocalization analyses to identify causal variants and their enrichment in functional contexts, such as affected cell types and genomic features. With the expansion of functional genomic (FG) datasets, which now include hundreds of thousands of tracks across various cell and tissue types, it is critical to establish scalable algorithms integrating thousands of diverse FG annotations with GWAS results. ResultsWe propose BTS (Bayesian Tissue Score), a novel, highly efficient algorithm uniquely designed for 1) identifying affected cell types and functional elements (context-mapping) and 2) fine-mapping potentially causal variants in a context-specific manner using large collections of cell type-specific FG annotation tracks. BTS leverages GWAS summary statistics and annotation-specific Bayesian models to analyze genome-wide annotation tracks, including enhancers, open chromatin, and histone marks. We evaluated BTS on GWAS summary statistics for immune and cardiovascular traits, such as Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), and Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). Our results demonstrate that BTS is over 100x more efficient in estimating functional annotation effects and context-specific variant fine-mapping compared to existing methods. Importantly, this large-scale Bayesian approach prioritizes both known and novel annotations, cell types, genomic regions, and variants and provides valuable biological insights into the functional contexts of these diseases. Availability and implementationDocker image is available at https://hub.docker.com/r/wanglab/bts with pre-installed BTS R package (https://bitbucket.org/wanglab-upenn/BTS-R) and BTS GWAS summary statistics analysis pipeline (https://bitbucket.org/wanglab-upenn/bts-pipeline).
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- LDAK-KVIK performs fast and powerful mixed-model association analysis of quantitative and binary phenotypes 96%
- Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary statistics. 95%
- Fast and flexible joint fine-mapping of multiple traits via the Sum of Single Effects model 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.