Back

Multicenter Comparison of AI Deep Learning Reconstruction, Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection for Coronary Artery Calcification Scoring

Winkler, A. R.; Campos, J. D.; Winkler, M. L.

2024-11-01 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2024.10.30.24316447 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo validate the feasibility of AI Deep Learning Reconstruction for Coronary Artery Calcification Scoring in order to decrease radiation exposure on a 4cm detector CT scanner. This is the first such validation on devices that are most commonly utilized for this procedure. MethodsData from 105 consecutive patients referred for Coronary Artery Calcification Scoring (CACS) in 4 centers was reconstructed with Filtered Back Projection (FBP), Iterative Reconstruction (Hybrid-IR), and AI Deep Learning Reconstruction (AI DLR), and analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively to determine if AI DLR can be routinely used for this purpose. Additional phantom testing was performed to determine if further dose reduction can be accomplished with AI DLR while maintaining or improving image quality compared to current Hybrid-IR reconstruction. ResultsQuantitively, there was excellent agreement between the three reconstructions (FBP, Hybrid IR and AI DLR) with an interclass coefficient of 0.99. The mean CACS for Filtered Back Projection Reconstructions was 111.05. The mean CACS for Hybrid-IR was 91.30. The mean CACS for AI Deep Learning Reconstructions was 93.50. Qualitatively, image quality was consistently better with AI DLR than with Hybrid-IR at both soft tissue and lung windowing. Based on our phantom experiments, AI DLR allows for dose reduction of at least a 37% without any image quality penalty compared to Hybrid-IR. ConclusionsThe use of AI DLR for use in CACS on 4 cm coverage CT scanner has been quantitatively and qualitatively validated for use for the first time. AI DLR produces qualitatively and quantitively better image quality than Hybrid-IR at the same dose level, and produces good agreement in categorization of Agatston scores. In vivo and in vitro evaluations show that AI DLR will allow for an at least a 37% further dose reduction on a 4 cm coverage CT scanner.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
6
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
8
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
10
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
12
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
13
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
16
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
23
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%