The Role of Prompt Engineering for Multimodal LLM Glaucoma Diagnosis
Agbareia, R.; Omar, M.; Zloto, O.; Chandala, N.; Tai, T.; Glicksberg, B. S.; Nadkarni, G.; Klang, E.
Show abstract
Background and AimThis study evaluates the diagnostic performance of multimodal large language models (LLMs), GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 3.5, in detecting glaucoma from fundus images. We specifically assess the impact of prompt engineering and the use of reference images on model performance. MethodsWe utilized the ACRIMA public dataset, comprising 705 labeled fundus images, and designed four prompt types, ranging from simple instructions to more refined prompts with reference images. The two model were tested across 5640 API runs, with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV assessed through non-parametric statistical tests. ResultsClaude Sonnet 3.5 achieved a highest sensitivity of 94.92%, a specificity of 73.46%, and F1 score of 0.726. GPT-4o reached a highest sensitivity of 81.47%, a specificity of 50.49%, and F1 score of 0.645. The incorporation of prompt engineering and reference images improved GPT-4os accuracy by 39.8% and Claude Sonnet 3.5s by 64.2%, significantly enhancing both models performance. ConclusionMultimodal LLMs demonstrated potential in diagnosing glaucoma, with Claude Sonnet 3.5 achieving a sensitivity of 94.92%, far exceeding the 22% sensitivity reported for primary care physicians in the literature. Prompt engineering, especially with reference images, significantly improved diagnostic performance. As LLMs become more integrated into medical practice, efficient prompt design may be key, and training doctors to use these tools effectively could enhance clinical outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rates of Glaucoma Progression Derived from Linear Mixed Models Using Varied Random Effect Distributions 96%
- Visual field evaluation using Zippy Adaptive Threshold Algorithm (ZATA) Standard and ZATA Fast in patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals 95%
- Relating Standardized Automated Perimetry Performed with Stimulus Sizes III and V in Eyes With Field Loss due to Glaucoma and NAION 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detecting papilloedema as a marker of raised intracranial pressure using artificial intelligence: a systematic review 96%
- An Inherently Interpretable AI model improves Screening Speed and Accuracy for Early Diabetic Retinopathy 95%
- Self-supervised contrastive learning improves machine learning discrimination of full thickness macular holes from epiretinal membranes in retinal OCT scans 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unveiling the Clinical Incapabilities: A Benchmarking Study of GPT-4V(ision) for Ophthalmic Multimodal Image Analysis 97%
- Autonomous Screening for Laser Photocoagulation in Fundus Images Using Deep Learning 95%
- Automated Expert-level Scleral Spur Detection and Quantitative Biometric Analysis on the ANTERION Anterior Segment OCT System 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Glaucoma Detection and Staging from Visual Field Images using Machine Learning Techniques 97%
- Towards implementation of AI in New Zealand national screening program: Cloud-based, Robust, and Bespoke 96%
- Prediction of the ectasia screening index from raw Casia2 volume data for keratoconus identification by using convolutional neural networks 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.