Back

An assessment of evidence to inform best practice for the communication of acute venous thromboembolism diagnosis: a scoping review

Mishra, S.; Klok, F. A.; Le Gal, G.; de Wit, K.; Schwartz, A.; Luijten, D.; Sadeghipour, P.; Bayley, J.; Woller, S.

2024-10-30 hematology
10.1101/2024.10.29.24316375
Show abstract

BackgroundPhysician communication with patients is a key aspect of excellent care. Scant evidence exists to inform best practice for physician communication in patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, collectively referred to as venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to summarize the existing literature on best practices for communication between healthcare providers and patients newly diagnosed with VTE. MethodsWe performed a scoping review of the extant literature on best practice for physician patient communication and the diagnosis and management of VTE. Manuscripts on communication between healthcare professionals and patients with acute vascular diseases, including VTE, were eligible. Two authors independently reviewed titles, and consensus determined article inclusion. The manuscripts were further categorized into two main categories: best practice in communication and unmet needs in communication. Data aggregation was achieved by a modified thematic synthesis. ResultsAmong 345 initial publications, 22 manuscripts met inclusion criteria with 11 that addressed VTE, five pulmonary embolism, four deep vein thrombosis, one atrial fibrillation, and one acute coronary syndrome. Eleven manuscripts addressed communication of VTE diagnosis, while 12 focused on communication of VTE treatment. Eleven manuscripts identified unmet communication needs, and 14 addressed best practice. Our review shows that good communication surrounding the VTE diagnosis and treatment can enhance satisfaction while suboptimal communication can incur emotional, cognitive, behavioral, social, and health-systems adverse effects. ConclusionScant literature guides best practices for communicating VTE diagnosis and treatment. Further research is necessary to establish practices for improving communication with VTE patients.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 26%
16.8%
2
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
British Journal of Haematology
based on 12 papers
Top 0.2%
12.2%
4
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 5%
3.2%
5
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 1%
3.2%
6
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 48%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 6%
2.7%
8
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 32%
2.7%
9
Blood
based on 14 papers
Top 0.4%
2.7%
10
Public Health in Practice
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
based on 10 papers
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 8%
1.7%
14
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 8%
1.4%
15
Heart
based on 10 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Critical Care Explorations
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Circulation
based on 37 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
18
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
19
Critical Care
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
20
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 18%
1.3%
21
Tropical Medicine & International Health
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Atherosclerosis
based on 16 papers
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Leukemia
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Blood Advances
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.7%