Neural basis of negative future mental imagery-based simulation in the bipolar disorder spectrum
Di Simplicio, M.; Visser, R. M.; Alfarano, G.; Ji, J.; Suri, S.; Holmes, E. A.
Show abstract
ObjectivesDysfunctional mental imagery-based simulations of emotional future events (episodic future simulation) - can contribute to emotional dysregulation in the bipolar disorder spectrum (BPDS). For example, vividly imaging social encounters having a disastrous outcome can trigger low mood. However, episodic future simulation may be perceptually modified to reduce their emotional intensity, which may in turn reduce BPDS mood instability. This study investigates the neural bases of perceptual and emotional characteristics of negative episodic future simulation in BPDS, and of perceptually manipulating such imagery. MethodsEuthymic participants with BPDS (N=20) and healthy controls (HC, N=17) underwent an fMRI scan whilst generating, then perceptually modifying, negative episodic future imagery, and during rest. ResultsNegative episodic future imagery were rated as significantly more real and unpleasant in the BPDS compared to HC group. Critically, perceptual manipulation of such imagery reduced ratings in the BPDS group to HC levels. Whole-brain analyses of task-based neural activity revealed greater activation in networks including right frontal pole, middle and inferior frontal gyrus and insula during episodic future simulation in BPSD versus HC. BPDS participants showed greater intrinsic resting state functional connectivity within the default mode network than HC participants. ConclusionsFindings suggest dysfunctional episodic future simulation circuitry across default mode network, fronto-parietal and fronto-insular areas may represent a neural mechanism via which mental imagery amplifies emotion in BPDS. Perceptual modifications to dampen such imagery successfully abolished subjective and neural differences between groups, indicating promise as an intervention tool targeting mood instability.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Brain Model of Altered Self-Appraisal in Social Anxiety Disorder 97%
- Potential Neurocognitive Biomarkers for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Severity in Recent Trauma Survivors 95%
- Whole-brain Mechanism of Neurofeedback Therapy: Predictive Modeling of Neurofeedback Outcomes on Repetitive Negative Thinking in Depression 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential Roles of Positive and Negative Valence Systems in the Development of Post-Traumatic Stress Psychopathology 94%
- Functional MRI connectivity accurately distinguishes cases with psychotic disorders from healthy controls, based on cortical features associated with neurodevelopment 94%
- Maladaptive avoidance learning in the orbitofrontal cortex in adolescents with major depression 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Resting-State Network Analysis of Suicide Attempt History in the UK Biobank 95%
- Effective connectivity during faces processing in major depression – distinguishing markers of pathology, risk, and resilience 94%
- Higher amplitudes of visual networks are associated with trait but not state- depression. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estradiol Modulates Resting-State Connectivity in Perimenopausal Depression 95%
- Neuroimaging Correlates of Emotional Response-Inhibition Discriminate Between Young Depressed Adults With and Without Sub-threshold Bipolar Symptoms 95%
- Disorder-and cognitive demand-specific neurofunctional alterations during social emotional working memory in generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disorder- and emotional context-specific neurofunctional alterations during inhibitory control in generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder 95%
- A Fundamental Distinction in Early Neural Processing of Implicit Social Interpretation in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder 94%
- Predicting depression risk in early adolescence via multimodal brain imaging 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.