LncRAnalyzer: Uncovering Long Non-Coding RNAs and Exploring Gene Co-expression Patterns in Sorghum Genomics
Nikhil, S.; Mohideen, H. S.; Raja, N. S.
Show abstract
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) is a versatile crop with significant phenotypic and genetic diversity. Despite the availability of multiple resequenced sorghum genomes, noncoding genomic regions remain underexplored. Long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) is a major transcript category with relatively low expression and complex expression patterns that can be identified via RNA-seq. However, it is challenging to distinguish them from protein-coding genes because of their low abundance and tissue-specific expression. In the present study, we employed a dual sorghum reference genome scheme to identify 9467 (31.49% cultivar-specific) and 9551 (28.93% cultivar-specific) lncRNAs in sorghum cultivars BTX642 and RTX430, respectively. Our results showed that a few lncRNAs were linked to pre- and post-flowering drought tolerance in these two genotypes. The NPCTs encoded elements such as transposon-derived Pol polyproteins (RE-1, RE-2, TNT-1), pentatricopeptide repeat proteins, receptor-like protein kinases, zinc finger BED proteins, and putative disease resistance proteins, etc., suggesting their involvement in drought-specific phenotype development. Cis and trans acting targets for identified lncRNAs were predicted. The results showed that upregulated lncRNAs targeted C2H2, B3, putative zinc finger domain, Ras-related protein, L-ascorbate peroxidase-S, lanosterol synthase, and DUF domain genes during drought, which highlights their role in drought tolerance. The downstream gene coexpression analysis revealed time point-specific lncRNA interactions with TFs, resulting in substantial alterations in major TF numbers, including AP2/ERF-ERF, bHLH, bZIP, C2H2, MYB, and NAC. This study provided a more comprehensive understanding of drought tolerance in sorghum by identifying lncRNAs and examining their gene coexpression patterns.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome wide characterization and expression analysis of CrRLK1L gene family in wheat unravels their roles in development and stress-specific responses 96%
- Sorghum pan-genome explores the functional utility to accelerate the genetic gain 96%
- Systematic analysis of the R2R3-MYB family of transcription factors in Camellia sinensis: evidence for species-specific catechin biosynthesis regulation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- ESD1 Affects Seed Setting Rate in Rice by Controlling Embryo Sac Development 95%
- Natural variation in GmRAV confers ecological adaptation through photoperiod control of flowering time and maturity in soybean 95%
- Identification of new growth regulators using cross-species network analysis in plants 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The full-length transcriptome of Spartina alterniflora reveals the complexity of high salt tolerance in monocotyledonous halophyte 96%
- Transcriptomic dynamics of petal development in the one-day flower species, Japanese morning glory (Ipomoea nil) 96%
- Production of homozygous deletion mutants targeting fertilization regulator genes through multiplex genome editing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic analysis of 1,298 RNA-Seq samples and construction of a comprehensive soybean (Glycine max) expression atlas 96%
- Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of pea shoot development and cell-type-specific responses to boron deficiency 96%
- ALI-1, candidate gene of B1 locus, is associated with awn length and grain weight in common wheat 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene co-expression networks highlight key nodes associated with Ammonium nitrate in sugarcane 95%
- Genomic evidence reveals SPA-regulated developmental and metabolic pathways in dark-grown Arabidopsis seedlings 95%
- Comparative Analysis of Small Secreted Peptide Signaling during Defense Response: Insights from Vascular and Non-Vascular Plants 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.