Enhancing the accuracy of a multivariable prediction model to identify medical patients suitable for Same Day Emergency Care services
Atkin, C.; Gallier, S.; Hodson, J.; Li, L.; Evison, F.; Reddy-Kolanu, V.; Sapey, E.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo test the performance of the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score (GAPS) and Ambulatory Score (Amb score), and derive and validate a novel score for the identification of Emergency Department (ED) attendances suitable for treatment by Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) services. DesignRetrospective diagnostic study using routinely collected data from electronic healthcare records. SettingThree hospitals in the diverse urban setting of Birmingham, UK, between April 2023-March 2024. ParticipantsAdult patients with an unplanned hospital attendance requiring internal medicine assessment. Main Outcome MeasuresSuitability for treatment by SDEC services, defined as being discharged alive with a length of stay of <12 hours ("LOS<12"). ResultsData were included for 152,877 attendances, with a median age of 58 years (interquartile range: 38 to 76), and of which 54.3% were by female patients and 68.4% of White ethnicity; the outcome of LOS<12 was achieved in 45.0% (N=68,752). The GAPS and Amb score had moderate predictive accuracy, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) of 0.741 (95% CI: 0.738 to 0.744) and 0.733 (95% CI: 0.730 to 0.736), respectively. A novel score was produced, comprising the factors from the GAPS and Amb score, as well as the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) and primary presenting complaint. When applied to an internal validation set (N=27,078), the resulting SDEC Triage Tool (SDEC-T) achieved an AUROC of 0.850 (95% CI: 0.845 to 0.854), with performance being similar across the three hospitals (AUROC range: 0.845 to 0.858). ConclusionsThe novel score derived within this diverse cohort has superior accuracy to the existing Amb score and GAPS for the identification of patients suitable for treatment in SDEC.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 97%
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 96%
- Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with covid-19 assessed in Accident and Emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 96%
- Validating the RISE UP score for predicting prognosis in patients with COVID-19 in the emergency department, a retrospective study 96%
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 97%
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 96%
- LMIC-PRIEST: Derivation and validation of a clinical severity score for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19 in a middle-income setting 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive accuracy of computer-aided versions of the on-admission National Early Warning Score in estimating the risk of COVID-19 for unplanned admission to hospital: a retrospective development and validation study 96%
- Differences in medication reconciliation interventions between six hospitals: a mixed method study 93%
- Measurement Matters: Changing Penalty Calculations under the Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) Cost Hospitals Millions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult patients admitted with COVID-19 in East London: a retrospective cohort analysis 94%
- Post-COVID assessment in a specialist clinical service: a 12-month, single-centre analysis of symptoms and healthcare needs in 1325 individuals 93%
- The utility of established prognostic scores in COVID-19 hospital admissions: a multicentre prospective evaluation of CURB-65, NEWS2, and qSOFA 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.