Mixed methods implementation research of oral antiviral treatment for COVID-19 in low and middle-income countries: a study protocol
Narayanasamy, S.; Gambanga, F.; Boeke, C. E.; Udayakumar, K.; Brothers, L.; Wolfe, C. R.; Agwuocha, C.; Asamoa-Amoakohene, M. N.; Dethleuxay, K.; Griffith, B. C.; Hamza, N.; Joseph, J.; Kimani, P.; Kirungi, R.; Lufesi, N.; Mbewe, N.; McCarthy, E.; Mulenga, M.; Mukiibi, M.; Mwenifumbo, T.; Ofori-Boadu, L.; Okoli, I.; Phongphila, S.; Regan, S.; Rwagasore, E.; Staple, A.; Tebor, J.; Tomno, W.; Umuraza, S.; Bosworth, H. B.
Show abstract
IntroductionThere is an absence of real-world evidence, especially from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), on the implementation successes and challenges of COVID-19 test and treat (T&T) programs. In 2022, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was provided as standard of care for mild to moderate COVID-19 treatment in eight LMICs (Ghana, Kenya, Laos, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda, Uganda and Zambia). This manuscript describes a research protocol to study novel drug introduction during the COVID-19 health emergency, with implications and learnings for future pandemic preparedness. The goal of the study is to provide simultaneous program learnings and improvements with program rollout, to fill a gap in real-world implementation data on T&T programs of oral antiviral treatment for COVID-19 and inform program implementation and scale-up in other LMICs. Methods and analysisThis multiple methods implementation research study is divided into three components to address key operational research objectives: 1) program learnings, monitoring and evaluation; 2) patient-level program impact; and 3) key stakeholder perspectives. Data collection will occur for a minimum of six months in each country, up to the end of grant. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics for each country and then aggregated across the program countries. Stakeholder perspectives will be examined using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research implementation science framework and semi-structured interviews. Ethics and disseminationThis study was approved by the Duke University Institutional Review Board (Pro00111388), The study was also approved by the local institutional review boards in each country participating in individual-level data collection (Objectives 2 and 3): Ghana, Malawi, Rwanda and Nigeria. The studys findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated through dialogue events, national and international conferences and through social media. Trial registration numberClinicaltrials.gov NCT06360783. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDYO_LIThe knowledge generated though this study will improve understanding of the key characteristics of a strong test and treat (T&T) program, and may translate to improved local T&T program implementation and better patient outcomes. C_LIO_LIThis study uses real-world routinely collected health data and is not designed as a randomised trial; therefore, data quality may be a challenge and the study cannot be used to compare patient outcomes. C_LIO_LIThis study protocol could be adapted to rapidly assess rollout of test and treat interventions to provide real-time learnings in health emergencies. C_LIO_LILessons learned from this study could be applied to other T&T scenarios, particularly around new product introduction, and provide reciprocal innovations to other countries and contexts on the feasibility, challenges, and successes of program implementation. C_LIO_LIThis study is designed to fill a gap in real-world implementation data on T&T programs of oral antiviral treatment for COVID-19 and inform program implementation and scale-up in low- and middle-income countries. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 95%
- Protocol for a qualitative study exploring the experiences and perceptions of dolutegravir/lamivudine dual antiretroviral therapy (the PEDAL Study) in people living with HIV 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strengthening health system’s capacity for pre-exposure Prophylaxis for adolescent girls and young women and adolescent boys and young men in South Africa (SHeS’Cap – PrEP): Protocol for a mixed methods study in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa 96%
- Strengthening Health System’s Capacity for Linkage to HIV Care for adolescent girls and young women and adolescent boys and young men in South Africa (SheS’Cap-Linkage): Protocol for a mixed methods study in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa 95%
- Design and implementation of a global site assessment survey among HIV clinics participating in the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) research consortium 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating Isoniazid Preventive Therapy into the Fast-Track HIV Treatment Model in Urban Zambia: A Proof-of -Concept Pilot Project 96%
- Exploring variations in the implementation of a health system level policy intervention to improve maternal and child health outcomes in resource limited settings: A qualitative multiple case study from Uganda 95%
- Implementing essential diagnostics-learning from essential medicines: A scoping review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Public engagement and crowdfunding for health research: A global qualitative evidence synthesis and TDR pilot 94%
- Availability, scope, and quality of monkeypox clinical management guidelines globally: a systematic review 94%
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and response on the utilisation of health services during the first wave in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Case-Finding Strategies: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
- Effects of cash transfer and incentive programs on service utilization and treatment outcomes related to neglected tropical diseases and their impact on health and nutrition in low and middle-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review 93%
- The PUPPY Study - Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Exploring Problems Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.