Back

Tattoo practices and risk of hepatitis B and hepatitis C infection in the general population

Foerster, M.; Zins, M.; Goldberg, M.; Ribet, C.; Kab, S.; Hosseini, B.; McCarty, R.; McCormack, V.; Ezzedine, K.; Schuez, J.

2024-10-27 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.10.25.24316096 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo prevent hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) infections and associated deaths from hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis, better identification of transmission routes is needed. Here, we reassessed the impact of different tattooing practices on viral transmission. DesignPopulation based cohort-study. SettingCancer Risk Associated to the Body Art of Tattooing (CRABAT) cohort as part of the ongoing French national cohort study Constances (baseline examination from 2012-2018). Participants110,402 participants (60,387 women and 50,015 men), of which 11.6% (12,789) were tattooed as per Constances follow-up questionnaire 2020. Complete exposure data on different exposure settings and countries of tattooing collected via complementary exposure assessment in 2023 (response rate 60%) was available for 7740 tattooed (4930 women and 2810 men) participants. Main outcome measuresSelf-reported HBV and HCV infections that were confirmed by surface antigen testing (HBsAG) and antibody (Anti-HCV) testing, respectively. Associations of different tattoo exposure characteristics (any tattoo; tattooed in/outside tattoo parlours; tattooed in/outside regulating countries; no tattoos (reference)) on subsequent HBV and/or HCV infections were assessed via multivariate logistic regression models, minimally adjusted and adjusted for known hepatitis risk factors, in the population >=45 years. Post-hoc, number of preventable HCV infections due to unsafe tattooing outside tattoo parlours was estimated. ResultsIn fully adjusted models, tattooing was associated with increased risk of any hepatitis infection (Odds ratio (OR): 1.46 (95% confidence interval: 1.15; 1.86), with a particularly strong increased risk for HCV (2.26 (1.64; 3.11)) compared to HBV (1.08 (0.77; 1.52)) infection. The increased risk for HCV and to a lesser extend for HBV was due to tattooing outside tattoo parlours (HCV: 4.75 (2.81; 8.03); HBV: 1.88 (0.99; 3.57)) whereas tattooing outside regulating countries was associated with an increased risk for HCV (2.74 (1.00; 7.45) and HBV (1.96 (0.80; 4.84)). Risk of HBV and/or HCV were around 10-fold for tattooing outside tattoo parlours outside regulating countries. The estimated number of preventable HCV infections through safe tattoo practices was around 12,000 in France and over 150,000 in Europe. ConclusionThe impact of unsafe tattooing practices as a preventable risk factor for HCV transmissions is highly underestimated. What is already known on the topic?O_LITattooing was identified as a potential transmission route for hepatitis infections in the early 1990s. C_LIO_LIHygiene measures were implemented in tattoo parlours throughout (many) European countries to prevent bloodborne infection transmission through tattooing needles. C_LIO_LICurrent hepatitis prevention strategies rarely/never consider tattooing as a common transmission route. C_LI What this study addsO_LIUnsafe tattooing practices are very common. One in four tattooed people got at least one tattoo outside parlours and one in five got tattooed in a country without strict hygiene regulations. C_LIO_LIUnsafe tattooing practices strongly increase the risk of HCV and to a lesser extend for HBV, making it the most important HCV transmission route after injecting drugs. C_LIO_LIThe study provides evidence that raising awareness on unsafe tattooing and upscaling screening of persons that underwent unsafe tattooing might help to substantially reduce hepatitis infections and related morbidity and mortality. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.8%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.0%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
7
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
8
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
12
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
13
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.8%
15
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
20
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
29
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
30
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%