Developing a functional precision medicine assay to predict pathological complete response in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: Interim results from the PEAR-TNBC Trial
Hall, P.; Williams, M.; Peerani, E.; Tham, E. l.; Iori, F.; de Fraine, G.; Loughrey, K.; Kaffa, A.; Richardson, T.; Velentza-Almpani, A.; Wiskerke, D.; Sangkola, F.; Crawley, A.; Kearney, J.; Bah, N.; Tasoulis, M.; KIrwan, C.; Cleator, S.; Chan, S.; Ranatunga, D.
Show abstract
IntroductionMore than 150,000 women die worldwide every year of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC). There are a range of treatment options, but no good way to match patients to their optimal treatment. For most newly diagnosed patients with early TNBC, the current standard of care is neoadjuvant chemo/immunotherapy before surgery, with patients who achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) having a better prognosis. We have developed a Functional Precision Medicine (FPM) test that uses a fresh biopsy, dissociates the cells, embeds them in a 3D hydrogel matrix, cultures them in a microfluidics device and tests them against a range of systemic therapies, while using a computer vision pipeline to measure responses to therapies ex vivo. MethodsWe designed and conducted an observational multi-centre clinical trial to assess the feasibility of using our FPM assay in patients with newly diagnosed TNBC undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. Patients underwent an additional core needle biopsy followed by systemic therapy as part of routine care. We assessed the response in our assay against whether patients achieved pCR or not at the time of definitive surgery, and calculated Receiver-Operating Characteristic curves (ROC) to optimize cut-offs. In patients who did not achieve pCR, we explored whether there were other regimens that had a better in-assay performance. ResultsIn cohort A, we recruited 34 patients, of whom 12 are evaluable as of 31st July 2024 All were female. Nine patients achieved a pCR. Specificity was 100%, sensitivity 78%, p = 0.0455 and the AUC for the ROC for predicting pCR vs. non-pCR was 0.78. In the 3 patients who did not achieve a pCR, one patient had a regimen that performed better in assay than the treatment they received, and where the response was greater than the cut-off that predicted pCR in other patients. ConclusionWe have presented interim results from a novel FPM assay in patients with early stage TNBC. Our test demonstrates good performance in predicting pCR. The trial continues to accrue data, and Cohort B continues to recruit (PEAR-TNBC; NCT05435352). CoI statementWilliams, Peerani, Tham, Iori, de Fraine, Loughrey, Kaffa, Richardson, Liberal, Velentza-Almpani, Wiskerke, Sangkolah, Crawley, Kearney, Bah, Ranatunga are employees of Pear Bio, with salary, stock options and IP. Hall has received honoraria from Pfizer, Eisai, MSD, Seagen, Exact Sciences, Gilead, AstraZeneca and conference expenses from Lilly and Novartis. Williams has research funding or agreements from Cancer Research UK, Breast Cancer Now, The Brain Tumour Charity, Brain Tumour Research and Novocure. Tasoulis has received honoraria from the BMJ and Company: BMJ and IntegraConnect Kirwan reports no Conflict of Interest
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiplexed drug testing of tumor slices using a microfluidic platform 92%
- Development and validation of a gene expression score to account for tumour purity and improve prognostication in breast cancer 92%
- Explainable, federated deep learning model predicts disease progression risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Phase 1b dose expansion and translational analyses of olaparib in combination with the oral AKT inhibitor capivasertib in recurrent endometrial, triple negative breast, and ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer 93%
- Clinical Validation of Digital PCR-based ctDNA detection for risk stratification in residual triple negative breast cancer: TRICIA trial results 92%
- Tumor-specific activity of precision medicines in the NCI-MATCH trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational drug repositioning for the identification of new agents to sensitize drug-resistant breast tumors across treatments and receptor subtypes 92%
- Extracellular vesicle molecular signatures characterize metastatic dynamicity in ovarian cancer 92%
- Diagnostic accuracy and safety of coaxial core-needle biopsy (CNB) system in Oncology patients treated in a specialist cancer centre with prospective validation within clinical trial data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- RNA Sequencing-Based Single Sample Predictors of Molecular Subtype and Risk of Recurrence for Clinical Assessment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer 93%
- Circulating tumor DNA dynamics using a standardized multi-gene panel in advanced breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibition and endocrine therapy 92%
- A 20-feature radiomic signature of triple-negative breast cancer identifies patients at high risk of death 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Frequent post-treatment monitoring of colorectal cancer using individualized ctDNA validated by multi-regional molecular profiling 91%
- Spatial, Temporal, and Molecular Heterogeneity of ADC targets in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma 91%
- Bypassing cisplatin resistance in Nrf2 hyperactivated head and neck cancer through effective PI3Kinase targeting 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.