Back

Oncogenic Alterations, Race, and Survival in US Veterans with Metastatic Prostate Cancer Undergoing Somatic Tumor Next Generation Sequencing

Valle, L. F.; Li, J.; Desai, H.; Hausler, R.; Haroldsen, C.; Chatwal, M. S.; Ojo, M.; Kelley, M. J.; Rebbeck, T.; Rose, B. S.; Rettig, M. B.; Nickols, N. G.; Garraway, I. P.; Yamoah, K.; Maxwell, K. N.

2024-10-25 genomics
10.1101/2024.10.24.620071 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeNational guidelines recommend next generation sequencing (NGS) of tumors in patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) to identify potential actionable alterations. We sought to describe the spectrum and frequency of alterations in PCa-related genes and pathways, as well as associations with self-identified race/ethnicity, and overall survival in US Veterans. Patients and MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and Non-Hispanic white (NHW) Veterans with mPCa who obtained NGS through the Veterans Affairs National Precision Oncology Program. 45 genes in seven canonical or targetable mPCa pathways were evaluated in addition to TMB and MSI status. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated associations between race/ethnicity and genomic alteration frequencies. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine associations between race/ethnicity, specific gene/pathway alteration, and overall survival. Results5,015 Veterans with mPCa who had NGS conducted were included (1,784 NHB, 3,231 NHW). NHB Veterans were younger, had higher PSA at diagnosis, were less likely to report Agent Orange exposure, and resided in more deprived neighborhoods compared to NHW Veterans. Nine of the top ten most commonly altered genes were the same in NHB v NHW Veterans; however, the frequencies of alterations varied by race/ethnicity. NHB race/ethnicity was associated with higher odds of genomic alterations in SPOP (OR 1.7 [1.2-2.6]) as well as immunotherapy targets (OR 1.7 [1.1-2.7]) including MSI high status (OR 3.1 [1.1-9.4]). Furthermore, NHB race/ethnicity was significantly associated with lower odds of genomic alterations in the AKT/PI3K pathway (OR 0.6 [0.4-0.7]), AR axis (OR 0.7 [0.5-0.9]), and tumor suppressor genes (OR 0.7 [0.5-0.8]). Cox proportional hazards modelling stratified by race/ethnicity demonstrated alterations in tumor suppressor genes including TP53 were associated with shorter OS in both NHB (HR 1.54 [1.13-2.11] and NHW individuals (HR 1.52 [1.25-1.85]). ConclusionIn the equal access VA healthcare setting, Veterans undergoing NGS for mPCa exhibited differences in alteration frequencies in both actionable and non-actionable pathways that may be associated with survival. This analysis affirms the utility of genomic testing for identifying candidates irrespective of race/ethnicity for precision oncology treatments, which could contribute to equitable outcomes in patients with mPCa.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.7%
3
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
5
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.5%
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
8
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
10
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
11
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
12
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
14
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
16
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
18
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
The Prostate
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
28
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%