Back

Safety and Efficacy of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy for Recurrent Glioblastoma: An Augmented Meta-analysis of Phase 1 Clinical Trials

Azzam, A. Y.; Morsy, M. M.; Azab, M. A.; Elamin, O.; Elswedy, A.; Ahmed, O. S.; Nassar, M.; Al Zomia, A. S.; Mohamed, A. A.; Atallah, O.; Alamoud, A.; Alotaibi, H. A.; Abukhadijah, H. J.; Nashwan, A. J.

2024-10-24 oncology Community evaluation
10.1101/2024.10.23.24316015 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionGlioblastoma is a devastating brain tumor with poor prognosis despite current treatment modalities. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy has shown promise in other cancers but has yielded mixed results in glioblastoma. This augmented meta-analysis aims to address the limitations of previous studies and evaluate the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy for recurrent glioblastoma. MethodsWe followed PRISMA guidelines, including specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, for our literature review. Eight studies with 108 patients were included. We used standard and augmented meta-analyses to assess outcomes, complications, and publication bias. ResultsIt was found that the mean overall survival for glioblastoma patients who underwent CAR T-cell therapy was 6.49 months, demonstrating no significant deviation from the median survival observed in those following the standard protocol. CAR T-cell therapy did not lead to a statistically significant improvement in achieving complete responses, with only 80% of patients exhibiting this outcome. Conversely, 44% of patients experienced stable disease, while 58% faced disease progression after CAR T-cell therapy. Adverse events were notable, with CAR T cell therapy-related encephalopathy affecting 37% of treated patients, while cytokine release syndrome was a rare event, observed in only 3% of cases. ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study that utilizes this novel statistical technique to predict the outcomes of CAR T-cell therapy for recurrent glioblastoma. The results of this study are predictive rather than confirmatory. CAR T-cell therapy for glioblastoma was not predicted to significantly improve survival or achieve substantial complete responses. Stable disease rates are modest, while disease progression is notable. Adverse events, especially CAR T-cell therapy-related encephalopathy, raise safety concerns. Further trials and refinements are needed to enhance CAR T-cell therapys effectiveness and safety in glioblastoma treatment, Manuscript Click here to view linked References potentially through optimizing administration routes and target antigens or combining it with other therapies. This challenging disease necessitates continued research to improve patient outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.4%
3
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
7
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
12
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
17
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%