Association between TikTok use and the development of eating disorders in young Colombian adults between 18 and 25 years of age
Restrepo-Escudero, L.; McCormick, S.; Cuevas, M. I.; Mosquera, S.; Vasquez-Ponce, M.; Correa-Mendez, M. J.; Patino, M. C.; Reyes, P.; Gonzalez Ballesteros, L. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundVisual and appearance-based social media platforms like TikTok can establish unrealistic beauty standards and self-esteem issues, leading to the development of eating disorders (EDs). This study aims to evaluate the association between TikTok usage and the presence of EDs risk behaviors and body dissatisfaction among Colombian young adults aged between 18 and 25 years. MethodsA cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted via an online survey through snowball sampling with 171 participants. The survey assessed demographic variables, social media use, content consumption, EDs risk behaviors, and body dissatisfaction through validated tools. Non-parametric tests and regression models were used for the data analysis. ResultsTikTok users showed significantly higher scores in ED risk behaviors (M = 14.91) and body dissatisfaction (M = 21.9) compared to non-users. Contributory usage, particularly collaborative content creation, was the most associated with increased risk. The multivariate regression model for ED risk explained 3% of the variance, while TikTok use accounted for 30% of the variance in the model for body dissatisfaction. DiscussionOur study found a significant association between TikTok use and the development of ED risk behaviors and body dissatisfaction. These findings align with previous research and highlight the need for interventions that encourage mindful social media consumption.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Weight-normative messaging predominates on TikTok – a qualitative content analysis 96%
- Temperament profile and its association with the vulnerability to smartphone addiction of medical students in Indonesia 94%
- Validation of anthropometric-based weight prediction equations among Ugandan adults: A Cross-sectional study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 95%
- Gynaecological health patterns and motherhood experiences of female professional football players 93%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and use analysis of ‘gestioemocional.cat’, a web app for promoting emotional self-care and access to professional mental health resources during the covid-19 pandemic 91%
- Identifying Women at Risk for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Using a Mobile Health Application 90%
- Individual factors influencing public’s perceptions about the importance of COVID-19 immunity certificates: a cross-sectional online questionnaire survey in the UK 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social networking service, patient-generated health data, and population health informatics: patterns and implications for using digital technologies to support mental health 95%
- Reactions to an Online Demonstration of the Effect of Increased Fruit and Vegetable Consumption on Appearance: Survey 93%
- Multimodal Recruitment for an Internet-Based Pilot Study of Ovulation and Menstruation (OM) Health 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-Consensual Sex among Japanese Women in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Large-Scale Nationwide Survey-Based Study 92%
- Using the Mercy Method to Estimate Ideal Body Weight in Children. A Description and Validation of a New Methodology 92%
- “One more tool in the tool belt”: A qualitative interview study investigating patient and clinician opinions on the integration of psychometrics into routine testing for disorders of gut-brain interaction 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.